#Approximation of laws - Trade marks - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 3(1) - Grounds for refusal to register - Taking account of all the relevant facts and circumstances - Prohibition on registering a

Kokott prezentate la 13 martie 2014.#Nordea Bank Danmark A/S împotriva Skatteministeriet.#Cerere de decizie preliminară formulată de Østre Landsret.

Concluziile avocatului general Kokott prezentate la data de 13 martie 2008.#Commune de Mesquer împotriva Total France SA și Total International Ltd.

#Inter-Mark Group sp. z o.o. sp. komandytowa v Minister Finansów.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Poznaniu - Poland.

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Taxation — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 9 and 11 — National legislation permitting the inclusion of non-taxable persons in a group of persons who may

#Appeal — EU trade mark –– Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant

#Appeal – EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Jacobs delivered on 4 May 2005.#Ursel Koschitzki v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tribunale di Bolzano - Italy.

. # Exclusive rights in the matter of radio and television broadcasting - Free movement of goods - Freedom to provide services - Rules on competition - Freedom of expression. # Case C-260/89.

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Jacobs delivered on 2 May 1996. # Ingrid Hoever and Iris Zachow v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen

#Trimitere preliminară – Cooperare judiciară în materie civilă – Competența judiciară, recunoașterea și executarea hotărârilor în materie civilă și comercială – Regulamentul (UE) nr. 1215/2012 – Competență

Opinion of Advocate General Trstenjak delivered on 18 May 2010.#Peter Pammer v Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co. KG (C-585/08) and Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH v Oliver Heller (C-144/09).

#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 –Article 5(3) — Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict — Copyright — Dematerialised content — Placing

#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue

#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2006.#The Queen, on the application of: Diane Barker v London Borough of Bromley.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: House of Lords - United Kingdom.

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 10 mai 2007.#Regina, à la demande de Thames Water Utilities Ltd contre South East London Division, Bromley Magistrates' Court (District Judge Carr).

#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue

– Obligation to state reasons – Article 88 – Obligation of confidentiality – Article 14 – Resolution objectives – Sale of business of the entity concerned – Conditions of sale under which an offer may

#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue