Opinion of Mr Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 14 April 2011. # Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities v Interpipe Nikopolsky Seamless Tubes Plant Niko Tube ZAT

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Lenz delivered on 12 September 1996. # Bernardina Martínez Losada, Manuel Fernández Balado and José Paredes v Instituto Nacional de Empleo (INEM) and Instituto Nacional de

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 2 March 2017.#Vinyls Italia SpA v Mediterranea di Navigazione SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Venezia.

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer delivered on 12 February 2004. # Sakir Öztürk v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Arbeiter. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Oberster Gerichtshof

Conclusioni dell'avvocato generale Kokott del 19 febbraio 2009.

Opinion of Mr Advocate General Léger delivered on 21 March 2002. # Regina v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte W.H. Strawson (Farms) Ltd and J.A.

Conclusions de l'avocat général M. M. Szpunar, présentées le 6 février 2025.#X contre Russmedia Digital SRL et Inform Media Press SRL.

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 14 March 2024.#Aeris Invest Sàrl v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (SRB).

Opinion of Advocate General Cruz Villalón delivered on 14 April 2015.#ClientEarth v European Commission.

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 28 February 2019.#M. Çoban v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Uwv).

#Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 - Protection of the European Union’s financial interests - Article 3 - Recovery of an export refund - 30-year limitation period - Limitation rule forming part of the

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 24 May 2012.#Bank Handlowy w Warszawie SA and PPHU ‘ADAX’/Ryszard Adamiak v Christianapol sp. z o.o.

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 13 February 2014.#Minister van Financiën v X BV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 8 March 2017.#X v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 28 March 2019.#HQ and Others v Aegean Airlines SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Nederland.

View of Advocate General Mengozzi of 17 May 2010.#Criminal proceedings against E and F.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf - Germany.

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 26 March 2020.#European Commission and Council of the European Union v Francisco Carreras Sequeros and Others.

Opinion of Advocate General Trstenjak delivered on 6 March 2007.#Bonn Fleisch Ex- und Import GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Finanzgericht Hamburg - Germany.

– Potential competition – Restriction by object – Characterisation – Calculation of the amount of the fine – Rights of the defence – Reasonable time – Loss of documents due to the passage of time – General

Opinion of Advocate General Trstenjak delivered on 18 May 2010.#Peter Pammer v Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co. KG (C-585/08) and Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH v Oliver Heller (C-144/09).