AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0910DEC003326996
10 septembre 1998
10 septembre 1998
and that no extension of the time-limit had been requested.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1022DEC003177996
22 octobre 1998
22 octobre 1998
In this respect he submitted that the authorities had unduly delayed the proceedings.
Source officielleCASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1203REP002419694
3 décembre 1996
3 décembre 1996
The doctor then certified, for the purposes of section 184, that he had "examined" the applicant and had formed the view that she was suffering from mental illness requiring involuntary committal on a
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016DEC002589994
16 octobre 1996
16 octobre 1996
VILA AMIGÓ Mrs. M.F.
Source officielleCASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0121REP002679395
21 janvier 1998
21 janvier 1998
VILA AMIGÓ Mrs M. HION Mr R.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1023DEC002732395
23 octobre 1997
23 octobre 1997
This had not been communicated to the applicant and was not reproduced or summarised in the Board's decision.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0630DEC002851895
30 juin 1997
30 juin 1997
After the village doctor had examined the applicant he was taken to the Van State Hospital.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1022DEC003580897
22 octobre 1998
22 octobre 1998
and that, on 18 April 1993, he had dropped it in the sea.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1021DEC004145798
21 octobre 1998
21 octobre 1998
VILA AMIGÓ Mrs M. HION Mr R. NICOLINI Mrs M.F.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0913DEC003139896
13 septembre 1996
13 septembre 1996
He complained in particular that the Nanterre tribunal de grande instance had modified its order after its notification to the parties, particularily after an appeal had been lodged.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0701DEC003992398
1 juillet 1998
1 juillet 1998
To date the Constitutional Court has not yet decided.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0313DEC004013698
13 mars 1998
13 mars 1998
This was refused by the Police Department (Polizeidirektion) of the Government (Regierungsrat) of the Canton of Zürich on the ground that he had had sufficient time to complete his studies.
Source officielleCASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0918REP003753497
18 septembre 1998
18 septembre 1998
According to the applicants, they subsequently had repeatedly problems with special forces of the Turkish police authorities.
Source officielleCASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520REP003285796
20 mai 1998
20 mai 1998
VILA AMIGÓ Mrs M. HION Mr R. NICOLINI 12.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0409DEC002632495
9 avril 1997
9 avril 1997
The City Court again had regard to the fact that part of the seized amphetamine had been exceptionally pure, while part had been exceptionally diluted.
Source officielleCASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0408REP002385794
8 avril 1997
8 avril 1997
However, the applicant, who had been aware as from 4 December 1991 that F.H. would indict him, had waited over half a year until 21 July 1992 when he had formally challenged F.H. 37.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0304DEC003857097
4 mars 1998
4 mars 1998
He had moved to West Berlin in 1960 upon the order of the said Ministry.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0117DEC002635295
17 janvier 1997
17 janvier 1997
On the other hand, judge C., who had issued the judgment, had not heard any witnesses.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0227DEC002883895
27 février 1997
27 février 1997
VILA AMIGÓ Mrs. M. HION Mr. R.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0409DEC002800995
9 avril 1997
9 avril 1997
The applicant raised the same matters before the single judge as had been raised by him before the Defence Council. On 24 May 1995 this application was rejected.
Source officiellePage 10 sur 56