The circumstances of the case The facts, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

        The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. The applicants 3.     All the applicants are Greenpeace activists.

    The applicant is an active officer of the Russian navy, third rank captain. He was born in 1963 and lives in Kronshtadt, Leningrad Region. 7.

However, this time he alleged that it was not him who shot the two villagers but that Captain Nihat Yiğiter and Bülent Yetüt, a first-lieutenant, had shot them in the shooting range.

       The facts of the case as submitted by the parties may be summarised as follows.   A.

The court also ordered that the applicant remain in custody pending examination of the case and noted as follows: “...

Article 11 reads as follows: “ 1.

At the material time he was a captain in the air force.

    The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. I.         THE APPLICANTS 5 .

      Captain Mehmet Göçmen 54.

    Captain Kargılı, the central district gendarmerie commander, took charge of the investigation at the scene.

The court was comprised of a Permanent President of Courts Martial (an army Lieutenant Colonel due to remain in his post for four years until retirement), two army Captains and a legally qualified civilian

The court martial comprised a president (a Royal Navy captain), four naval officers and a judge advocate, who was a serving naval officer and barrister working as the naval legal advisor to FLEET (the

of the application inadmissible; the decision by the Russian Government not to exercise   their right to intervene in the proceedings; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated, decides as follows

The gendarme captain took a statement from him during the day of 27 December 1992, probably at around 17.00 to 17.30 hours.

The court reasoned as follows: “... [the applicant] M. K.

    The relevant provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (“the Montego Bay Convention”) (to which Cambodia is not a party) read as follows: Article 108: Illicit traffic

        The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.