the person concerned manage to escape the captain’s control owing to any negligence of the latter in the implementation of the requisite measures, [the captain would be] brought before the judicial authorities

    On 6 July 2015 the applicant received an email from a private foundation providing support for educational programmes, “Captains” (hereinafter referred to as the “Captains foundation”).

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

It follows from the record that Captain P. testified, in particular, that he had been asked to pose as the purchaser of the forged promissory note which the applicant’s co-defendant, Mr K., had undertaken

    Criminal proceedings against the captain of the boat and the applicant On 6 September 2009 an investigating judge opened an investigation against the captain of the boat on account of a “

On 17 January 2003 the Admiralty Marshal and the ship's captain informed our office that the crew members were refusing to comply with the captain's instructions concerning their repatriation and were

Captain Hart replied by letter dated 12 June 1997.

Moreover, as follows from statements by [the applicant’s] fellow conscripts, soldiers A., Ba. and P., whom [the applicant] identified as eyewitnesses to his alleged beatings by Captain Ch., the latter

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.   A.

Mr Panov was taken to the head of the medical unit, captain C.

The relevant parts of the order read as follows: “... The internal investigation has revealed that Captain [H.M.] ... was assigned responsibility for military bases [including] no. 12 and ...

The Sergeant ordered Lance Corporal L.S. to inform the Captain personally.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants and as they appear from the documents submitted by them, may be summarised as follows. 3.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

The case concerns a complaint by the former captain of the Prestige about a decision to remand him in custody for causing marine pollution.

Having discussed the matter with the captain, the applicant sent a letter to the company in which he stated his request. The letter, drafted by the captain, was dated 10 and 11 July 1991.

Ms Y. and Captain S., threatening to kill the latter. He refused to comply with a lawful request by Captain S., ... behaved aggressively, pushed [Captain] S. and attempted to leave.

The court was comprised as follows: a President, Lieutenant Colonel A.D.

He defied a lawful demand by Captain S.... behaved aggressively, pushed S. away and attempted to leave.