THE LAW On 9 February 2010 and 27 February 2021, respectively, the second and first applicants died.

His wife died on 2 July 1993.

On 24 April 2018 the applicants informed the Court that the applicant Dumitru Chirică had died on 9 November 2005 and that his heirs wished to pursue the application.

On 30 September 2012 the applicant received information from the hospital that his mother had died on 28 September 2012. He was shocked by the news.

    His wife died on 10 May 1994.

    On 30   November 2009 the Government informed the Court that they had learned that the applicant had died on 22   January 2009.

While in custody the first applicant was diagnosed with pancreatitis and he died in pre-trial detention on 16 November 2009. He was convicted posthumously.

On 12   February 2015 the applicant’s representative informed the Court that on   6   December 2014 the applicant had died.

He died on 27   July 2007. He was represented before the Court by Ms A. Stavitskaya, a lawyer practising in Moscow. 2.

    The Government asked for the revision of the judgment of 21   September 2023, which they had been unable to execute in full because Mr Dumitru Mardare had died before the judgment was

On 27 April 2019 the applicant’s son, Mr Beskrylyi, replied that the applicant had died on 24 July 2015. He also expressed his wish to pursue the application.

In his reply of 30 April 2013 Mr Jevtović did not contest that Mr Milomir Vidić, Mr Radomir Aleksić, and Mr Petronije Perić had died before the applications were lodged, but stated that he had been unaware

  68860/10), Mr Suleyman Dzhabrailov, had died on 2   July 2014. They accordingly requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule   80 of the Rules of Court. 4.

    The Government requested revision of the judgment of 21   September 2023 which they had been unable to execute because Ms Ciucă had died before the judgment was adopted.

    The Government asked for the revision of the judgment of 13 January 2022, which they had been unable to execute in full because Mr Pădurariu had died before the judgment had been adopted.

    The Government asked for the revision of the judgment of 5 May 2022, which they had been unable to execute in full because Mr Șchiopu had died before the judgment had been adopted.

    The Government asked for the revision of the judgment of 2 December 2021, which they had been unable to execute in full because Mr Geambec had died before the judgment had been adopted.

Tinka Rusinova NIKOLOVA 1935 Died in 2025 Bulgarian Veilko Tarnovo 2. Rozin Stefanov MILEV 1957 Bulgarian Veliko Tarnovo 3. Byala Damyanova MILEVA 1938 Died in 2021 Bulgarian Vaglevtsi 4.

  17431/23 died and that Ms Aggeliki Tsoutsi and Mr Christos Tsoutsis, the applicant’s children, expressed their wish to pursue the application in the applicant’s stead.

    The Government asked for the revision of the judgment of 15   December 2022, which they had been unable to execute in full because Mr   Zarafim had died before the judgment was