Ruiz, Esq., the lead counsel on the applicant’s defence team, representing him before the Guantánamo military commission (see paragraphs 56-57 below) 6.

Your Government are also requested to inform the Court, by the same date, about the steps which will be taken by your authorities after receipt of this letter in order to comply with the interim measure

Roβ, a lawyer practising in Essen. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

The Essen Regional Court allowed the charges in a modified form and heard the applicants’ case over 116 days as from 4   October 2010, hearing over 40 witnesses and experts.

In this case the Court will therefore apply the Engel criteria as identified above. 37.

Devlete hizmeti de esas alırız. İnsanları aptal biliriz. Onca yıl mürekkep yalamışlığımız bizi onlardan farklı kılar. Bu bir itiraftır. Biz aptalız.”

It is not clear exactly when [it] will pull its hand out of the bag or how [it] will do so” (“ Türkiye Devleti içinde de muhtemelen bütün bu gelişmeleri dış dünyada daha fazla belgeleyen, izleyen bir başka

It will thus examine these complaints under Article 6 of the Convention.

The Contracting States that are parties to a case are in principle free to choose the means whereby they will comply with a judgment in which the Court has found a breach.

    The applicant was represented by Mr Sami Esen and Mr   Serhat Hamdi Aydın, lawyers practising in Istanbul.

as follows: “... the Dean shall decide whether disciplinary measures should be taken against the defendant and, if he or she finds it necessary, shall forward the case to the Integrity Court, which will

It will examine the present case in the light of these principles. 29.

She is represented before the Court by Mr Selahattin Esmer, a lawyer practising in Ankara.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

On 17 January 1991 the applicant was detained on remand at Fleury-Mérogis (Essonne) and his wife was placed under judicial supervision in Ecos (Eure), both having been charged with aggravated receiving

For practical reasons, Saffet   Güneş will continue to be called “the applicant” in this judgment although his heirs are now to be regarded as such (see Dalban v.

Turkey , no. 34738/04, § 42, 5 June 2007, and Hüseyin Esen v.   Turkey , no. 49048/99, § 63, 8 August 2006). It finds no reason to reach a different conclusion in the present case. 61.

Belkıza Kaya and Others (33420/96), Mahmut Kaya (22535/93), Ekrem (75632/01), Wolf-Sorg (6458/03), Özgen and Others (38607/97), Akdeniz and Others (23954/94), İpek (25760/94)) and that the Committee will

d'avoir fait une dénonciation calomnieuse, les a condamnés à des peines d'emprisonnement avec sursis et les a condamnés à verser des dommages et intérêts aux parties civiles; "aux motifs propres que c'est

These reports are obtainable from the publisher Carl Heymanns Verlag KG (Luxemburger Straße 449, D-50939 Köln), who will also arrange for their distribution in association with the agents for certain countries