Thus, according to the Court of Criminal Appeal, A.F.’s testimony was enough to conclude that the applicant was guilty of simulation of offence.

    Finally, although, in general, the expression “the state of the evidence” may be a relevant factor for the existence and persistence of serious indications of guilt, in the present case it

Although, in general, the expression “the state of evidence” may be a relevant factor for the existence and persistence of serious indications of guilt, in the present case it nevertheless, alone, cannot

pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage that he had sustained as a result of his arrest and pre-trial detention in the context of the above-mentioned criminal proceedings, and awarded him 15,000   Turkish liras

  On 2 July 2001, Neklinovskiy District Court found the applicant guilty of the same offences but relieved him from serving the sentence under the statute of limitations.

  On 4 April 2001 he was convicted and sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment and fined 30,000 Maltese liras (approximately EUR 72,273) for trafficking in dangerous drugs.

    On 28 February 2002 the trial court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to three years and nine months' imprisonment. The applicant's brother was acquitted. 23.

    On 31 January 2005 the Istanbul Assize Court found the applicant guilty and sentenced him to life imprisonment under Article 146 § 1 of the Criminal Code. 13.

Although, in general, the expression “the state of evidence” may be a relevant factor for the existence and persistence of serious indications of guilt, in the present case it nevertheless, alone, cannot

Convention owing to the applicant’s contention that the domestic courts’ interpretation and application of Article   220 § 6 of the Criminal Code (“the CC”) had amounted to a legal presumption of guilt

It held that the Dismissals Board had failed to give sufficient reasons for its decision because it had been taken without the applicant’s guilt having been established.

    On 18 April 2003 the Eyüp Assize Court awarded the applicant 3,372,421,663 Turkish liras (TRL) [1] and TRL 10,000,000,000 [2] in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage respectively

It found the gendarmes guilty of manslaughter and sentenced them to one year and eight months' imprisonment.

The Court considered that both the content of section 6(5) of Law no. 3713 and the judges' decisions stemmed from the hypothesis that the applicants, whose “guilt” had been established without trial in

Article 243 § 1 of the former Penal Code (Law no. 765) which regulated torture committed by civil servants read as follows: Article 243 “Any public official who, in order to extract a confession of guilt

    On 24 February 2006 the Bakırköy Assize Court held that the accused had ill-treated Harun Çetin with a view to extracting a confession of guilt and had caused his death.

. ; que, dès avant la découverte du corps de la victime et l'élucidation des causes de sa mort, Bruno D... livrait aux policiers un récit détaillé du guet-apens dans lequel Claude C... avait été attiré

him to six months and twenty days’ imprisonment and a fine of 55,555 Turkish liras.

    On 30 March 1989 the National Security Court found the applicant guilty as charged.