CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0316DEC003858197
16 mars 2004
The District Court should have held in its decision that the public prosecutor's right to bring charges had ceased to exist.
Page 10 sur 448
civ2
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2024:C200238
14 mars 2024
CIV. 2 LM COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Audience publique du 14 mars 2024 Cassation partielle Mme MARTINEL, président Arrêt n° 238 F-D Pourvoi n° D 22
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-169587
17 novembre 2016
Mar. resided there under a social tenancy agreement. On 12 February 2008 Mar. died.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1205DEC003554704
5 décembre 2013
however, the business did not bring the expected profits.
ECLI:CEDH:001-117461
18 février 2013
On 10 June 2007 the prosecutor’s office issued a refusal to bring criminal proceedings against the policeman.
Référés
686431210bb2f8a66ca6294a
1 juillet 2025
DE RÉFÉRÉ JUGE DES RÉFÉRÉS : Mélanie CABAL GREFFIÈRE : Candy PUECH PARTIES : DEMANDERESSE Madame [S] [E] demeurant 3 avenue Charles de Gaulle 12100 CREISSELS représentée par Me Christophe BRINGER
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0401DEC003020523
1 avril 2025
Bridger of Luke & Bridger Law, a law firm based in Nottingham; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.
ECLI:CEDH:001-152953
17 février 2015
The presiding judge set the first hearing, upon a recommendation of the President of the Division, for 8 March 2006.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2079173-2239633
6 septembre 2007
In March 2001 Mr Kucheruk was convicted of theft and hooliganism and sentenced to a year and a half suspended prison sentence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0504DEC005452200
4 mai 2006
That principle had been confirmed by the Constitutional Court's judgment of 12 March 2001.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0904DEC000830504
4 septembre 2006
The applicant did not, however, bring the dispute directly before the City Court as he could have done.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55423
7 décembre 1984
Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the convention"), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of "de Jong, Baljet and van den Brink
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0702DEC002743695
2 juillet 1997
According to Counsel's advice of 28 March 1995 it was not open to the applicant to bring proceedings in malicious falsehood (due to the decision of the court in the case against the newspaper) or an action
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2010:SO02537
15 décembre 2010
2005 à la société Assistance sécurité aéroportuaire puis le 31 janvier 2006 à la société Brink's security services ; que celle-ci a perdu le 1er avril 2006 le marché d'inspection filtrage des bagages
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0401DEC004540115
Protest march of 5 November 2013 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0324DEC007556701
24 mars 2005
The right to make free use of the land remained with her until her death and was inherited on 22 March 1973 by the second applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710DEC004295518
10 juillet 2025
17153/11 and 29 others, §§ 69-77, 25 March 2014).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1130DEC001123508
30 novembre 2009
On 9 March 2006 the applicant and two co-accused were indicted before the Wałbrzych District Court On 31 March, 19 June, 12 September and 7 December 2006 the trial court further extended the applicant’
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9430
20 mars 1997
March 1997 Beis v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-202499
13 mars 2020
margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 13 March