2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged lack of fairness of the criminal proceedings against the applicant who was convicted of illegal possession of weapons, preparation

36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 29 March

font-style:italic }   Communicated on 24 May 2019   FIRST SECTION Application no. 69776/17 HI TECH CORPORATION DOO against North Macedonia lodged on 20 September 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

allegedly carried out in breach of the principle of legal certainty.

restitution claim was submitted (as was the case with the claimants), and the date when the on-site examination was carried out.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1.

On the former date, the case was set down for trial on 15   March   1999. 17.     Between 15 March 1999 and 31 January 2001, a total of 119 hearings were held.

of the first applicant and of search-and-seizure operations carried out at the applicants’ homes.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

1999, il a demandé à partir en préretraite dans le cadre de l'accord groupe du 24 juillet 1998 sur les mesures de fin de carrière ; que par lettre du 15 mars, la société Axa a donné son accord pour un

2012     The facts and complaints in this case have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC.

(see paragraph   6 above) had been carried out properly and had led to a correct diagnosis. They submitted another supplementary report on 25 March 2013. 17.

On 26 March 2009 a search was carried out of the applicant’s house in the context of criminal proceedings instituted upon charges of burglary and theft of 480,000 United States dollars and 40,000 euros

By a judgment of 23 May 2001 the Administrative Court quashed the decision of 16 March 1999, pointing to numerous procedural flaws. It remitted the case for fresh consideration.

On 20   March 1996 the public prosecutor ruled that there was no case to answer, given the “absence of an act constituting any offence”, on the ground that, according to information provided by various

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.     Background to the case The applicant is a retired person with a category 2 disability.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The case file was allocated number 17468.