Turkey ((dec.), no. 4860/09, 26 March 2013). COMPLAINTS 10.

    The Government submitted that the applicant had failed to use the domestic length-of-proceedings remedies concerning the length of the civil proceedings before the ordinary courts. 18.

Italy - 40939/98 Judgment 21.3.2000 [Section III] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Reasonable time Length of civil proceedings: friendly settlement The case concerns the length of civil proceedings

On 27 March 2006 the Supreme Court rejected the applicant's petition for review.

  64890/01, 29 March 2006), that in its new examination of the case the Municipal Court “should also take into consideration the length of the proceedings in awarding just satisfaction for delays

On 14 March 2014 the prosecutor lodged a request for the applicant’s placement in detention on remand with the Cluj County Court.

    On 9 March 2004 the Court declared the application partly inadmissible and decided to communicate the complaints concerning the length of the proceedings.

  On 1 March and 15 March 1994 the hearings were adjourned as on the first date a defendant, and on the second date his representative were absent.

  6670/10, § 18, 17 March 2015). 25.

  On 11 March and 26 March 1997 the applicant appealed against the judgment.   On 12 March 1997 the defendant also appealed against the judgment.   20.

Lastly, the applicant complains that this right was violated by the overall length of the proceedings.

The decision of the Ankara Civil Court was subsequently notified to him on 14   March 2022.

, - rédigée par Madame Marie LEFORT, - signée par Madame Marie LEFORT, première Vice-présidente et Madame Aurélie HUGONNIER, Greffier Copie exécutoire délivrée le : Copie délivrée à : Vu l'assignation

X... a été engagé le 8 mars 2002 en qualité d'ingénieur technico-commercial par la société Imatech ; que convoqué le 23 avril 2003 à un entretien préalable à son licenciement par lettre du 15 avril 2003

    Length of proceedings 12.

    On 2 March 2000 the Administrative Court ( Upravni sud Republike Hrvatske ) quashed the decision of 27 March 1997 and remitted the case. 38.

It ended on 16 March 2004, when the Diyarbakır State Security Court convicted them.

by Article 13 of the Convention, an effective domestic remedy through which they could have been adequately compensated for the alleged excessive length of the procedure?

        On 14 March 1994 the applicant requested to be released.

On 17   March   2006 she was informed that on 2 March 2006 the case file had been transmitted to the Court of Appeal.