CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

53 617 résultats pour « Sittinger »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1461

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2009

16 juin 2009

The employment tribunal decided to refer the case to a special sitting to decide the issue, with a professional judge presiding.

Source officielle

Page 10 sur 2681

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-234290

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2024

17 mai 2024

They contend that the president of that panel, judge I.B., had partially examined their criminal case at the first instance level sitting as a single judge.

Source officielle
CC

cr

6079a8429ba5988459c4c3b1

Cassation

6 mars 1984

6 mars 1984

PREVENUE COUPABLE DE L'INFRACTION DE MAINTIEN SANS AUTORISATION D'UN BUREAU DE PLACEMENT PRIVE ; " AUX MOTIFS QUE LES DEUX PREVENUES ETAIENT GERANTES DE SOCIETES QUI AVAIENT NOTAMMENT POUR OBJET LE BABY-SITTING

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223554

Admin. suprême

15 février 2023

15 février 2023

On 16 December 2019 the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court (“DCSC”), sitting as the first-instance court, in a formation of two judges (Jacek Wygoda and Piotr Sławomir Niedzielak) and one lay judge

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0118DEC004358413

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2018

18 janvier 2018

s5B081A9D { width:168.28pt; display:inline-block }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 43584/13 Algimantas VYŠNIAUSKAS against Lithuania The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4278

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2004

24 juin 2004

In four judgments, the text of which was deposited with the Registry on 26 January 2004, the Italian Court of Cassation, sitting as a full court, established the principle that, when ruling on “Pinto appeals

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177192

Admin. suprême

31 août 2017

31 août 2017

A challenge against a judge sitting in a single judge formation is considered by this judge.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0519DEC002315994

Admin. suprême

19 mai 1994

19 mai 1994

        On 4 May 1993 at 16.00 hours the ferry left for Sweden with the applicant's mother and two siblings on board.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:1980:99

CJUE

27 mars 1980

27 mars 1980

. # Social sikring, ydelser ved arbejdsløshed. # Forenede sager 41/79, 121/79 og 796/79.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:1999:249

CJUE

18 mai 1999

18 mai 1999

. # Samarbejdsaftalen EØF-Marokko - Artikel 41, stk. 1 - Princippet om forbud mod forskelsbehandling på området for social sikring - Personelt anvendelsesområde. # Sag C-179/98.

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:1996:28

CJUE

1 février 1996

1 février 1996

#Social sikring af vandrende arbejdstagere - Rådets forordning nr. 1408/71 - arbejdstager bosat i en anden medlemsstat end den kompetente stat - ydelser ved arbejdsløshed.#Sag C-308/94.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0213DEC005788100

Admin. suprême

13 février 2001

13 février 2001

} .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 57881/00 by Jeyam SUNTHARAM against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-170113

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2016

1 décembre 2016

On 2 February 2009 the District Court, sitting in a single-judge formation composed of Judge R., granted a further extension which was upheld on appeal by the Ivanovo Regional Court on 17 March 2009.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238257

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 2024

28 octobre 2024

He further objects that the lay assessors sitting in the first-instance court had been elected by the council of the Central Bohemian Region which was itself a civil party in the proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0911DEC006407700

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2003

11 septembre 2003

On 25 January 2000 the Review Chamber of the Graz Regional Court ( Ratskammer ), sitting in camera, dismissed the applicant’s request for compensation for detention on remand under the Criminal Proceedings

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016DEC004257215

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2018

16 octobre 2018

The applicant’s appeal was dismissed on 7 October 2008 by the single-judge chamber ( enkelvoudige kamer ) of the Regional Court of The Hague, sitting in Dordrecht.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13832

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2022

13 octobre 2022

Ordinance no. 62-825 of 21 July 1962 individuals from Algeria with local civil status, and their children, were offered the possibility, in France, of obtaining recognition of French nationality by signing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0907DEC004028598

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 1999

7 septembre 1999

The appeal lies to the High Court of Justiciary sitting as an appellate court. It is necessary for leave to appeal to be granted.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217DEC001807313

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2019

17 décembre 2019

Those judges had sought to recuse themselves from sitting in the case, which proved that they had had a preconceived idea about the case. THE LAW 21.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0412JUD004354708

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2012

12 avril 2012

between siblings or sexual intercourse between siblings of the same sex or between relatives who were not blood ‑ related.

Source officielle