CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD003971205
13 janvier 2009
On 4 April 2006 the Kraków Appeal Prosecutor decided to obtain a psychiatric report on the applicant and his ability to stand trial. 11.
Page 10 sur 1634
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD003578507
He filed a complaint about a breach of his right to a fair trial within a reasonable time with the Kraków Court of Appeal.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD004509705
On 7 July 2006 the applicant lodged a complaint about the undue length of the proceedings under the Law of 17 June 2004 on complaints about a breach of the right to a trial within a reasonable
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0115JUD003788504
15 janvier 2009
On 29 November 2000 the applicant argued that his written statement should not be admitted in trial and the issue was examined in a trial within trial.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0115JUD000931805
Moreover, at the beginning of the proceedings it had been necessary to clarify in the applicant’s own interest whether he was actually able to stand trial, which unavoidably prolonged the proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0115JUD002267402
First trial 5. On 10 May 1998 the applicant, then fifteen years of age, was arrested.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0214JUD000453704
14 février 2008
However, the personal attendance of the defendant does not take on the same crucial significance for an appeal hearing as it does for the trial hearing (see Hermi v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0214JUD006700701
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0219JUD000067903
19 février 2008
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0221JUD002653305
21 février 2008
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0304JUD003839903
4 mars 2008
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0304JUD000105605
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0304JUD005740700
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0304JUD003125002
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0306JUD000545306
6 mars 2008
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0306JUD003180602
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318JUD002132607
18 mars 2008
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318JUD001645603
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318JUD004514806
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0320JUD001025403
20 mars 2008