CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0520REP002381894
20 mai 1997
On 2 March 1996, the Commission decided to invite the parties to present their written conclusions on the merits of the case, following transmission to the parties of the verbatim record.
Page 100 sur 819
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1211JUD002290910
11 décembre 2014
In the case of Hromadka and Hromadkova v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1026JUD003021096
26 octobre 2000
In March 1995 the applicant was examined by doctors six times. Two of those examinations were carried out by psychiatrists.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD006895511
15 janvier 2015
In the case of Dragojević v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0706DEC002750795
6 juillet 2000
The circumstances of the case 1. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0528JUD000663609
28 mai 2019
THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1205JUD000885716
5 décembre 2023
In the case of F.S. v.
soc
61372451cd5801467741483b
30 juin 2004
technicien, en régime de travail discontinu, perdant ainsi les majorations liées au travail en continu ; qu'estimant que l'accord d'entreprise relatif aux garanties individuelles contre les aléas de carrière
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0707DEC003032013
7 juillet 2020
However, even assuming that the aforementioned level of severity had been reached, the Court cannot but observe that the present case substantively differs from the cases of Udovičić and
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186579
4 septembre 2018
The circumstances of the case 2. The facts of the two cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1. Background of the case 3.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0702DEC002928195
2 juillet 1997
He was released pending trial on 18 March 1987.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517DEC001985406
17 mai 2016
The circumstances of the case 2. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0316DEC006388214
16 mars 2023
According to the applicant, the investigation into his case could be effective only if carried out under Article 171 or Article 296 of the Criminal Code.
ECLI:CEDH:001-162349
31 mars 2016
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1212DEC002718221
12 décembre 2023
Article 8 of the Convention and this Court’s case-law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0422JUD005746116
22 avril 2025
In the case of Aliyev v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0511DEC000746317
11 mai 2023
Several forensic medical examinations were ordered and carried out (producing reports dated 1 March 2013 and 15 January 2014).
ECLI:CEDH:001-167156
5 septembre 2016
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1.
ECLI:CEDH:001-161077
4 février 2016
The circumstances of the cases The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CEDH:001-110657
22 mars 2012
Нижний Новгород ) opened a criminal case in this connection and carried out an investigation.