In particular she complains that her right to a fair hearing was violated by the quashing of the judgment in her favour.

  In particular, he claimed that between 1934 and 1938 the decrees by which the land had been allocated to his father had been unlawfully modified in favour of Ján Peter Senior.

  He submitted that, as he had an alibi and numerous testimonies in his favour, the testimonies of people with whom he had not been confronted could not be held against him.

    The Court observes that the judgment in the applicant’s favour was enforced approximately six years and seven months after its delivery, and that no delays were attributable to the applicant

    On 22 December 2004, 5 January 2007, 10 April 2007, and 24 October 2007 the Novi Pazar Municipal Court adopted four judgments in the applicant’s favour according to which the debtor was ordered

    The final court judgments in the applicants’ favour remain partly enforced to the present day. 2.     The legal status of the debtor 12.

    The applicants complained of the non-enforcement of domestic decisions given in their favour and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.

    Complaint about non-enforcement of the judgment in the applicants’ favour By a letter of 22   March 2017 the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a unilateral declaration

  1 about allegedly unlawful refusal by domestic courts to index-link the judicial awards due to delayed execution of the judgments delivered in their favour.

    The applicant complained about prolonged non-enforcement of a judgment in his favour. 4.

    The part of the application concerning the quashing on 23   January   2004 of a final decision given in the applicant’s favour on 11   September   2002 had been communicated

; in cases nos. 52410/09, 3746/10 and 34681/11 the applicants complain that the extension of the time-limits for the prosecutors’ appeals in their cases and the quashing of final judgments in their favour

    The applicant complained about the quashing, by way of supervisory review, of the court final decision of 27   September 2007 in her favour.

  In the cases of Baygayev, Saidov and Galitskiy , the applicants complained that judgments in their favour had not been enforced in good time.

non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions according to which the applicants were entitled to various pecuniary amounts and/or to have certain actions taken by State authorities in their favour

    The applicants complained principally of the non-enforcement of domestic judgments given in their favour.

comply with their positive obligations under Article 2 of the Convention, the excessive length of criminal proceedings against the perpetrator and the quashing of a final judgment in the applicant’s favour

TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE GRENOBLE 6ème chambre civile N° RG 16/04215 - N° Portalis DBYH-W-B7A-H22B N° : DH/MD Copie exécutoire : Copie : Délivrée à : la SELARL CABINET LAURENT FAVET

COMPLAINTS The applicants complained about the delayed enforcement of the judgments in their favour. Mr Kazakov also raised other complaints.