CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513DEC005020312
13 mai 2014
He had recognized Ljuban and Mara Orić. Ljuban had had no visible injuries while Mara had been shot.
Page 102 sur 819
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209015
1 mars 2021
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-656624-662579
26 novembre 2002
of cases before them.
ECLI:CEDH:001-110603
9 mars 2012
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218DEC002846110
18 février 2014
The circumstances of the case 3. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1. Background 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0108DEC006926501
8 janvier 2004
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0204JUD004201906
4 février 2020
On 17 March 2006 the Eğirdir Civil Court partially accepted the applicants’ case and awarded them TRL 4,689,007 together with legal interest [1] .
ECLI:CEDH:001-226247
10 juillet 2023
The circumstances of the case 2. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. Detention at the Gostynin Centre 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0629DEC005383500
29 juin 2004
In any case he argues, referring to the case of Unión Alimentaria Sanders SA v.
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2022:CR00491
20 avril 2022
Aldebert, avocat général, après débats en l'audience publique du 22 mars 2022 où étaient présents M. Soulard, président, Mme Thomas, conseiller rapporteur, M.
ECLI:CEDH:001-158162
29 septembre 2015
On 4 March 2010 the applicant requested permission to copy documents from the case file and to be provided with time to consult the documents and submit her motions in writing.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1011DEC001247486
11 octobre 1988
The Government consider that no legal protection has to be granted in cases where the person concerned only has a theoretical interest to have the lawfulness of a measure which was already carried
ECLI:CEDH:001-233074
12 mars 2024
2023 communicated on 12 March 2024 STATEMENT OF FACTS 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0412DEC003084406
12 avril 2011
In the Marie-Louise Loyen and Bruneel judgment (see Marie-Louise Loyen and Bruneel v. France , no.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904DEC005984510
4 septembre 2018
In the present case, the applicant was placed in detention on remand on 29 March 2005.
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CR01777
12 septembre 2018
judiciaires des intéressées, des conditions particulières de reprise de l'activité par la gérante après le décès de son mari et, malgré la réitération des contrôles, de la relativité des faits reprochés
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1011DEC001232786
, but enquiries and a security clearance on the applicant were carried out and it must be presumed that they were carried out by the security services.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0113JUD003423606
13 janvier 2011
In the case of Popovic v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1204DEC000211810
4 décembre 2012
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant and as they emerge from the case file, may be summarised as follows. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD003958305
24 avril 2014
In the case of Perevedentsevy v.