.) - 25498/94 Decision 8.6.1999 [Section II] Article 3 Inhuman treatment Strict conditions of detention imposed on applicant because of his links with the mafia: inadmissible Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect

The applicant appealed, having stated, inter alia , that he had not been able to participate in the hearing because of his poor state of health.

  Article 1 of Protocol No. 4 was inapplicable to the system of imprisonment in default because it prohibited imprisonment for unpaid debts solely in the case of a “contractual obligation”.

the Grand Chamber on 17 November 2014] Facts – The applicant, a Libyan national who had been living in Sweden since 2010, applied for asylum there initially on the grounds that he feared persecution because

been prepared to accept that the interference had been aimed at protecting the constitutional order and ensuring compliance with electoral legislation, it was not necessary to decide this question, because

that she had also used the telephone and that the second applicant could not obtain examination of his arguments related to the deficiencies of the relevant order in the criminal proceedings, first, because

challenge in Supreme Administrative Court implied refusal of Minister of Education and Religious Affairs to grant authorisation sought: doubt as to starting-point of period for bringing such an appeal because

Law – Article 8: Article 8 was applicable because the allegations in the newspaper article were serious enough to impugn the personal integrity of the persons concerned.

2021 the Amsterdam Regional Court acquitted the applicant of these charges, considering that the incriminating statements the accused had made to the undercover agent had to be excluded from evidence because

Decision 14.6.2001 [Section IV] Article 5 Article 5-4 Review of lawfulness of detention Review of lawfulness of continuation of psychiatric detention of a person considered not to be criminally liable because

Tyrer, resident in the Isle of Man, alleging a violation of the convention because of a judicial corporal punishment inflicted upon him on the basis of legislation in force in the Isle of Man, a dependency

A hearing scheduled for 10 July 1995 was also postponed because of the lawyers' strike. On 22 and 25 September 1995, some of the accused were examined.

He underlines, in this respect, that the Court of Appeal dismissed his action because there was no prior response of the administrative authority, which was not imputable to him.

She argued that because of the four-year term of office for the Secretary General, she would have to leave the service on 14 November 2021, at the age of sixty-one, instead of retiring on 3 June 2027 at

He submits that because of his illnesses and the restricted possibilities to purchase certain food products in prison, he needed protein supplements, therefore, they were of essential importance for his

The applicants further claimed that because their property had been de facto expropriated, they should have, at the very least, received compensation The Constitutional Court did not consider the merits

Sur le rapport de Mme Bessaud, conseiller référendaire, les observations écrites de la SCP Lyon-Caen et Thiriez, avocat de la société SACM Durand, de la SCP Boré, Salve de Bruneton et Mégret, avocat de

DUFOURD Nathalie, Vice-présidente Assesseur :Madame ABODI Maryse, Représentant les employeurs et indépendants Assesseur :Monsieur JACQUOTTET Patrick, Représentant les salariés assistés par : Madame BERAUD