Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-203138
25 mai 2020
25 mai 2020
Was the failure of the respondent state hospitals to comply with the judgment of 16 January 2012 by the Zakarpattya Regional Court of Appeal, given in the applicant’s favour, compatible with
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1114DEC000476211
14 novembre 2019
14 novembre 2019
The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, concerning the lengthy enforcement of the judgment in the applicant’s favour and the domestic courts
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0529DEC001296107
29 mai 2018
29 mai 2018
The applicants’ complaint concerning delay in the enforcement of judgments in their favour was communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”), who were represented initially by Mr G.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0516DEC006314211
16 mai 2019
16 mai 2019
of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention concerning the insufficiency of the amount awarded as compensation for the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment in her favour
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177383
5 septembre 2017
5 septembre 2017
tenkis davası ) against her stepmother, claiming that she had been deprived of her reserved portion ( saklı pay ) in the inheritance because of her father’s legal transactions, prior to his death, in favour
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-211393
30 juin 2021
30 juin 2021
She was eventually granted a residence order in her favour in the main proceedings. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0218DEC003553518
18 février 2021
18 février 2021
The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the enforcement of a judgment in her favour were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”), who submitted observations
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1962:0312DEC000115961
12 mars 1962
12 mars 1962
.; Whereas the request lodged by the Applicant that the Attorney-General should introduce a plea of nullity in the Applicant's favour does not constitute a remedy within the meaning of Article 26
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1118DEC001577308
18 novembre 2014
18 novembre 2014
The applicant mainly complained of the prolonged non-enforcement of the domestic decisions in his favour. These complaints were communicated to the Government for information.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0312DEC006191409
12 mars 2013
12 mars 2013
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of the Protocol no.1 that despite the judgment given in his favour, the Municipality had not paid the due amount.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111610
23 mai 2012
23 mai 2012
On 20 June 2008 the Centru District Court found in favour of the applicant on the ground that contrary to the labour law, he had been dismissed while being on sick leave.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-243222
25 avril 2025
25 avril 2025
The search was relevant to criminal proceedings brought against an unknown person who had unlawfully obtained a grant from the State in favour of the private company.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218704
28 juin 2022
28 juin 2022
that the national authorities refused to comply with the administrative court’s interim and final decisions and took active steps to render nugatory the enforcement of the original judgment in his favour
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9116
5 novembre 2013
5 novembre 2013
In 2002 a municipal court in Kosovo ruled in his favour and ordered his reinstatement. Enforcement orders were issued in 2005 and 2006.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0126DEC004923907
26 janvier 2010
26 janvier 2010
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about non-enforcement of two judgments in his favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244551
8 juillet 2025
8 juillet 2025
On 14 November 2024 the Constitutional Court found partly in favour of the applicants and held that the principle of the presumption of innocence had been violated in connection with statements made by
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-238616
21 novembre 2024
21 novembre 2024
applicants of the criminal offences under Articles 147 (libel) and 148 (insult) of the Criminal Code and sentenced them to one year of corrective work with a deduction of 10% of their monthly income in favour
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231284
1 février 2024
1 février 2024
The domestic courts ruled in the plaintiffs’ favour, finding that the respondents had been unable to prove the veracity of the factual statements made in the publications, and ordered each of them, including
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-243911
28 mai 2025
28 mai 2025
In a judgment dated 28 July 2021, the Sliven District Court ruled in favour of the credit company, without addressing any of the arguments referred to above.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0404DEC000888522
4 avril 2024
4 avril 2024
The applicant’s complaints under Article 10 § 1 of the Convention concerning the pre-trial detention or non-suspended prison sentence imposed for the offence of propaganda in favour of a terrorist organisation
Source officiellePage 103 sur 606
FAVOT, Benoït
Autre jugement et ordonnance — Ouvre la procédure de redressement du patrimoine professionnel et du patrimoine personnel - Date de cessation des paiements : 09 Janvier 2025 - Mandataire : PELLEGRINI Gilles, 7/9 PLace de la Gare, 94210 LA VARENNE ST HILAIRE - Entrepreneur individuel en tant qu’avocat, exerçant au 08, rue de Chantilly - 75009 PARIS, demeurant 32, rue du général Beuret - 75015 PARIS Les déclarations des créances sont à adresser au mandataire judiciaire ou sur le portail électroniqu
12/07/2026
Voir →
WURTZ, Francoise, Simone, FAVOT
07/07/2026
Voir →
FAVOT, Michelle, Léone
30/06/2026
Voir →
FAVOTTO, Angélique, Maryse, Laetitia, MOMMAYOU
09/06/2026
Voir →
FAVOTTE
28/05/2026
Voir →