CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

16 369 résultats pour « Marc CASSIEDE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231570

Admin. suprême

12 février 2024

12 février 2024

Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s23860FF7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:center } Published on 4 March

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179046

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2017

3 novembre 2017

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5108

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2002

14 novembre 2002

  The applicant applied to the Office of the President of the Republic for a pardon on medical grounds; his application was rejected in March 2000.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-171880

Admin. suprême

7 février 2017

7 février 2017

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. The applicant was diagnosed with fertility problems.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14383

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2024

3 septembre 2024

In this respect, the present application differed from other cases in which such an objection had not been raised, although in those cases the relevant applicant had not lodged an appeal on points of law

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-221682

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2022

14 novembre 2022

  5436/22; R.G. 2561/2021 of 1 March 2022 no.   6766/22; R.G. 2556/2021 of 1 March 2022 no. 6767/22)?   3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242953

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2025

31 mars 2025

2025   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment by police officers from the Rapid Response Force ( çevik kuvvet ) in İzmir.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231288

Admin. suprême

1 février 2024

1 février 2024

On 3 June 2017 a search and seizure were carried out in the applicant’s home and in the office of Kanal 13 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245576

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2025

22 septembre 2025

Tsatinyan’s right to life, ensured by Article 2 of the Convention, violated in the present case?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12337

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2019

29 janvier 2019

In December 2015 a further round-the-clock curfew was imposed and remained in force until March 2016.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2602993-2833362

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2009

15 janvier 2009

may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑ member Grand Chamber of the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116049

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2012

18 décembre 2012

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016DEC003877010

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2012

16 octobre 2012

On 20 March 2003 the applicant was granted victim status. It is unclear whether she contacted the investigative authorities between March 2003 and September 2008.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-109493

Admin. suprême

2 janvier 2012

2 janvier 2012

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1201DEC006730001

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2009

1 décembre 2009

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520DEC003904797

Admin. suprême

20 mai 1998

20 mai 1998

The prosecution case had been that the applicant, a lesser member of the conspiracy, had been present at the time the murder was carried out by one of the leaders of the conspiracy.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-123185

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2013

5 juillet 2013

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179689

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2017

1 décembre 2017

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2185312-2334715

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2007

22 novembre 2007

would be called into question.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0520DEC003569297

Admin. suprême

20 mai 1998

20 mai 1998

The prosecution case had been that the applicant, a student aged 22 at the time, had been present at the time the murder was carried out by one of the leaders of the conspiracy.

Source officielle

Page 104 sur 819

← PrécédentSuivant →