CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000744612
24 juillet 2014
Three police officers were immediately sent to the scene. 7.
Page 105 sur 131
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115JUD003020606
15 janvier 2013
The applicants were represented by Ms V. Veselinovska, a lawyer practising in Probištip. The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their former Agent, Mrs R.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1109JUD002573205
9 novembre 2010
Five other claims were also lodged with the court by other victims. 16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD004072108
24 juillet 2012
The Hungarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr L. Höltzl, Agent, Ministry of Public Administration and Justice. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0510JUD007877413
10 mai 2016
They took him for walks in the prison yard, carried him to the toilet and washed him with wet towels, which was their way of showing that they were annoyed with his helplessness. 25 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0609JUD000499404
9 juin 2011
In the course of the proceedings seven hearings were adjourned at the applicant’s request or due to his failure to appear and five hearings were adjourned due to both parties’ failure to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1214JUD000143402
14 décembre 2006
The applicants were represented by Mr A. Vasiliu, a lawyer practising in Bucharest. The Romanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD005963209
18 juillet 2013
Other expert opinions were examined in writing.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0319JUD007005510
19 mars 2015
The Belgian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr M. Tysebaert, Senior Adviser, Federal Justice Department. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0210JUD001727303
10 février 2011
The applicants were represented by Mr J. Mazal, a lawyer practising in Písek. The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0429DEC003407802
29 avril 2008
duly informed of the position when the purchase deeds were drawn up ...”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0213JUD003137910
13 février 2014
The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD002273505
Furthermore, not all investigative measures ... were carried out.” 20.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0218JUD005570700
18 février 2009
The Latvian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms I. Reine. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0113JUD000658704
13 janvier 2011
aimed exclusively at offenders and which were factually justified by the original offence.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122JUD004910609
22 novembre 2016
On the same day the proceedings were stayed until his recovery. 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD002446504
19 février 2009
The funds received from the sale were transferred to the State budget. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0204JUD001379106
4 février 2010
His respective requests made to the court to reconsider its decisions were rejected between 10 April 2001 and 30 March 2004. 32.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417JUD002680808
17 avril 2012
The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1009JUD001073205
9 octobre 2008
The scheduled hearings of 11 and 18 December 2001 were postponed at the request of the applicant’s former husband (the defendant). 8.