VU L'ORDONNANCE RENDUE PAR LE JUGE COMMISSAIRE EN DATE DU 10/03/2026 SOUS LE NUMERO 2026/08 AYANT AUTORISE LA SELARL [Z] [B] PRISE EN LA PERSONNE DE ME [A] [B] A TRANSIGER AVEC LA SAS AU BON PANNETON AUX

Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 12 janvier 2026. Le magistrat désigné, Signé : H. A... Le greffier, Signé : P.

    The applicant complained that his disqualification from his parliamentary seat, ordered by the Special Supreme Court under the new Article 57 of the Constitution, had infringed his right

That decision harmed him in the exercise of his defence rights. 2.

He also emphasised that his detention was extremely harmful to him, given that he did not speak Polish and thus had no possibility of communicating with his co-detainees, who did not speak English or his

    In March 2002 Mr Pr waived his right to be present at hearings and asked the court to render a judgment with reference to his depositions made over the previous years.

But his legitimate heirs, Ms Claudia Morawetz and Mr Richard Morawetz expressed their will to pursue the original application. They are represented before the Court by Mr M.

    The applicant complained that he had no effective remedy at his disposal as regards his complaint under Article 6 § 1.

In the grounds of his complaint he claimed that the Regional Court had violated his rights under Articles 5 § 3 and 6 § 1 of the Convention and stated that the evidence pointing to the undue length of

    The applicant complained, in essence, that the administrative courts’ refusal to review the merits of his complaint about the decision of the appeals body amounted to a violation of his right

  His appeal with the Federal Ministry for Health, Sports and Consumer Protection was to no avail.   21.

Moreover, in exercising his freedom to manifest his religion, an individual may need to take his specific situation into account ( Kalaç v.

During his interrogation, the applicant claims that the police officers pulled his ears and he was beaten and subjected to falaka (beating on the soles of his feet). 7.

The case concerns the foreseeability of his conviction. Background 2.

After the special-forces officers had arrested [R.Sh.], his whereabouts were unknown. Later the same day he was found dead with marks of severe torture [on his person].

LA COUR DE CASSATION, DEUXIÈME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué, que M.

    À la suite des inventaires, le même jour, un compte-rendu de consultation fut établi par C.C.A.

art. 32-1), of the Convention has elapsed without the case having been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;     Whereas in his

abduction from his residence.

France - 62170/10 Judgment 23.1.2014 [Section V] Article 14 Discrimination Refusal to award “recognition allowance” to repatriated veteran of the Algerian war on the grounds of his European, as opposed