AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204266
7 juillet 2020
7 juillet 2020
The applicant’s request to be released on bail was refused.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216JUD001137502
16 décembre 2008
16 décembre 2008
On 27 November 1997 the Będzin District Court dismissed his request. 17.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-122866
24 juin 2013
24 juin 2013
Noting that the defendant organisation broadcasted in three channels and that 60% of its programs consisted of music, the applicant organisation considered that an equitable remuneration for broadcasting
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006DEC006065908
6 octobre 2015
6 octobre 2015
However, he was not provided with a copy of the forensic report and was not informed of its results. 12.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208512
9 février 2021
9 février 2021
She also lodged a request to apply provisional protective measures and suspend her removal.
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2655313-2903046
6 mars 2009
6 mars 2009
within a reasonable time) and Article 8 (right to respect for correspondence), he complains of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention and the criminal proceedings as a whole, of his requests
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0214DEC002552503
14 février 2006
14 février 2006
The applicants stated in reply that it had been very difficult for the second applicant to find a person suitable for appointment as their imam, whether through official or unofficial channels.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0330DEC007693301
30 mars 2006
30 mars 2006
It was also maintained that, on 20 October 1999 a local television channel broadcasted a programme on Hezbollah where Hasan Çiçek’s affiliation with the organisation was revealed.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0320DEC007348101
20 mars 2007
20 mars 2007
Both requests were disallowed.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0518DEC003519918
18 mai 2021
18 mai 2021
He repeated this request in writing on 20 December 2012.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009JUD003955902
9 octobre 2007
9 octobre 2007
On 14 August 2007 the applicants filed a written response to the Government's request. THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 7.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0119JUD001742910
19 janvier 2016
19 janvier 2016
by the person making the request (section 17). 21.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0522JUD001087015
22 mai 2025
22 mai 2025
This is revolting [and requires the attention of] the [anti-corruption centre] and the Prosecutor General’s Office.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0710JUD000339403
10 juillet 2008
10 juillet 2008
to requests for authorization made pursuant to paragraph 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0207JUD003995408
7 février 2012
7 février 2012
In Vienna he is in front of the cameras for the television series ... which should be starting on the second channel in the autumn.” The article was accompanied by a photo of X. C.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0614JUD007111101
14 juin 2007
14 juin 2007
Such interference will infringe Article 10 unless it satisfies the requirements of paragraph 2 of that provision.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0615DEC001836091
15 juin 1999
15 juin 1999
, to suspend its request for the submission of observations by the respondent Government.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0427DEC007078601
27 avril 2004
27 avril 2004
His requests were rejected by the court. Finally, on 19 December 1995, the Bucharest Regional Court allowed the request, imposing on the applicant an obligation not to leave the city.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0610DEC006060611
10 juin 2014
10 juin 2014
On 24 March 2011 the Inspector allowed her request. 13.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0409DEC000718921
9 avril 2024
9 avril 2024
The applicant’s requests to the authorities 11.
Source officiellePage 107 sur 143