CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

2 857 résultats pour « Requet- Chabanel »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-204266

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2020

7 juillet 2020

The applicant’s request to be released on bail was refused.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216JUD001137502

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2008

16 décembre 2008

On 27   November   1997 the Będzin District Court dismissed his request. 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-122866

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2013

24 juin 2013

Noting that the defendant organisation broadcasted in three channels and that 60% of its programs consisted of music, the applicant organisation considered that an equitable remuneration for broadcasting

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006DEC006065908

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2015

6 octobre 2015

However, he was not provided with a copy of the forensic report and was not informed of its results. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208512

Admin. suprême

9 février 2021

9 février 2021

She also lodged a request to apply provisional protective measures and suspend her removal.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2655313-2903046

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2009

6 mars 2009

within a reasonable time) and Article   8 (right to respect for correspondence), he complains of the excessive length of his pre-trial detention and the criminal proceedings as a whole, of his requests

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0214DEC002552503

Admin. suprême

14 février 2006

14 février 2006

The applicants stated in reply that it had been very difficult for the second applicant to find a person suitable for appointment as their imam, whether through official or unofficial channels.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0330DEC007693301

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2006

30 mars 2006

It was also maintained that, on 20 October 1999 a local television channel broadcasted a programme on Hezbollah where Hasan Çiçek’s affiliation with the organisation was revealed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0320DEC007348101

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2007

20 mars 2007

Both requests were disallowed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0518DEC003519918

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2021

18 mai 2021

He repeated this request in writing on 20 December 2012.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009JUD003955902

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2007

9 octobre 2007

On 14 August 2007 the applicants filed a written response to the Government's request.   THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0119JUD001742910

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2016

19 janvier 2016

by the person making the request (section 17). 21.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0522JUD001087015

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2025

22 mai 2025

This is revolting [and requires the attention of] the [anti-corruption centre] and the Prosecutor General’s Office.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0710JUD000339403

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2008

10 juillet 2008

to requests for authorization made pursuant to paragraph 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0207JUD003995408

Admin. suprême

7 février 2012

7 février 2012

In Vienna he is in front of the cameras for the television series ... which should be starting on the second channel in the autumn.” The article was accompanied by a photo of X. C.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0614JUD007111101

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2007

14 juin 2007

    Such interference will infringe Article 10 unless it satisfies the requirements of paragraph 2 of that provision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0615DEC001836091

Admin. suprême

15 juin 1999

15 juin 1999

, to suspend its request for the submission of observations by the respondent Government.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0427DEC007078601

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2004

27 avril 2004

His requests were rejected by the court. Finally, on 19   December   1995, the Bucharest Regional Court allowed the request, imposing on the applicant an obligation not to leave the city.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0610DEC006060611

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2014

10 juin 2014

    On 24 March 2011 the Inspector allowed her request. 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECGRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0409DEC000718921

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2024

9 avril 2024

  The applicant’s requests to the authorities 11.

Source officielle

Page 107 sur 143

← PrécédentSuivant →