The applicant complained principally of the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions given in his favour.

The Court further notes that the domestic awards in favour of all applicants had been executed.

    Complaints concerning lengthy non-enforcement of the judgments in the applicants’ favour By letters dated 30 July and 13 September 2010, the Government informed the Court of their unilateral

He considered that the quashing of a final judgment in favour of the applicant following the annulment proceedings had breached the applicant's rights under the Convention.

of Finance lodged an appeal with the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kabardino ‑ Balkaria (“the Supreme Court of Kabardino ‑ Balkaria”) against the final judgments in the applicants’ favour

    The Government submitted that no compensation in respect of pecuniary damage should be awarded because the judgments in the applicant's favour had been enforced in full.

    The remaining applicants complained that the authorities’ prolonged failure to fully comply with the binding and enforceable judgments in their favour violated their right to a court under

    The applicant complained, inter alia , that, contrary to Articles   6 §   1 and 14 of the Convention, the authorities failed to comply with judgments issued in his favour. 4.

    Complaints concerning lengthy non-enforcement of the judgments in the applicants' favour Following the Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v.

By a judgment of 6 October 1998 the Râşcani District Court ruled in favour of the applicant’s husband and ordered the bank to pay him MDL   16,000.

She based her action on Article 494 of the Civil Code and maintained that the competent authority for the application of Law   18/1991 had issued ownership title to the said land in her favour on

    The applicant complained that the costs which the domestic courts ordered him to pay in favour of the Company (paragraphs 6 and 7 above) put an excessive burden on him, alleging in substance

Čolić, a lawyer practising in Rijeka; the decision to give notice of the complaints concerning the delayed enforcement of a judgment adopted in the applicant’s favour and equality of arms in the proceedings

  1 to the Convention of the non-enforcement of the above domestic decision in her favour. RELEVANT LEGAL FRAMEWORK 3 .

conjunction with Article 314 § 2 of the   CC); (ii) of obstructing a public officer in the execution of his duties by using force (Article 265 of the CC), and (iii) of disseminating propaganda in favour

    The Court observes that on 10 April 2002 the applicant obtained a judgment in her favour against a local police department. On 5 June 2002 the judgment became enforceable.

    Complaints concerning lengthy non-enforcement of the judgments in the applicants' favour Following the Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v.

On the grounds of the terms of the new Act, the Court of Cassation quashed the judgments given in Mr Zielinski’s and Mr Pradal’s favour by the Metz Court of Appeal.

Russia there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the lengthy enforcement of eight judgments in his favour.