No one shall be deprived of his liberty save in the following cases and in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law: (...)

He also claimed that he be reinstated in his previous post.

Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Weidenfeld, présidente-rapporteure, - et les observations de Me Hiesse, pour le requérant. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

On 11 April 2005 the applicant withdrew his submission. On 17 May 2005 the first hearing took place.

Pôle 5 - Chambre 9 ARRET DU 07 MARS 2013 (n° , pages) Numéro d'inscription au répertoire général : 12/16393 Sur renvoi après cassation du 3 juillet 2012 (pourvoi n°W11-18.026) d'un arrêt rendu

His trial, before an assize court, ended on 26 March 1999, when he was sentenced to nine years’ imprisonment.

in his case lasted too long.

Having found that at the time of the commission of the offence the applicant was able to understand the unlawful nature of his acts but that his mental faculties were so poorly developed that he could

as well as his procedural claims.

obtained in violation of his right to remain silent and the privilege against self-incrimination and that he had been hindered in the effective exercise of his right to defence when questioned at the

Là, il a intérêt de me rendre le galet. On me reproche d'avoir affiché que Monsieur A... est une pourriture, qu'on devrait le priver de nourriture. Tant qu'il ne m'a pas rendu mon galet, je le dirai.

The applicant further claimed that evidence obtained in violation of Article 3 had been used at his trial, in breach of his right to a fair trial guaranteed by Article 6 § 1. 4.

His psychotic symptoms had therefore returned but he had stabilised rapidly as he had already re-taken his medication that morning.

    On 1 August 2014 the first applicant requested that the Centre specify his visiting rights regarding his daughter for that month.

The court found that the child was being given appropriate care by his mother and that it would be in his best interests to stay with his mother.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 8 of the Convention that the impugned decisions violated his right to respect for his private life.

    Before the first-instance court the applicant company argued that it was under no obligation to settle the advocate’s invoice in that the deficiencies in his representation had caused it

  Thus his contract with Mr.

LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la caisse de retraite des cadres de la profession pharmaceutique, CRCPP, dont le siège est, précédemment ...

DBVK-V-B7H-P5CE [X] [S] C/ MONSIEUR LE DIRECTEUR DU CENTRE HOSPITALIER REGIONAL MONSIEUR LE PROCUREUR GENERAL [E] [S] Décision déférée au premier président : Ordonnance rendue