Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0124DEC006639909
24 janvier 2012
24 janvier 2012
He complained under the same Article that he had not had a fair trial because he had not been legally summoned by the District Court and therefore his case had been discontinued.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0221DEC003101705
21 février 2012
21 février 2012
According to the applicant, his son’s physical condition had deteriorated so much that he became incapable to be removed.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0626JUD000073104
26 juin 2008
26 juin 2008
Second, the civil head of Article 6 did not apply to the litigation because it concerned military service. 13.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0330DEC004562999
30 mars 1999
30 mars 1999
In April 1992, he became a monk in the monastery of St George near Skopje. In February 1993 he was expelled from the Greek Orthodox Church.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0214DEC002305503
14 février 2006
14 février 2006
Moreover, the Government noted that, in any event, the alleged violations had been remedied on the domestic level, because the judgment was executed on 12 January 2005.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0902DEC005678600
2 septembre 2004
2 septembre 2004
The station director refused the request because lost or stolen tickets could not be re-issued. The applicant purchased new tickets at her expense.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0515DEC001115108
15 mai 2018
15 mai 2018
She further complained that her right to an effective remedy was infringed because her claim was dismissed by the courts. THE LAW 28.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1221JUD001288919
21 décembre 2021
21 décembre 2021
This information had been technical and confidential and she had asked for the County Court’s assistance because the expert could not obtain a response.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1023JUD002906305
23 octobre 2008
23 octobre 2008
The applicants’ house became decrepit because of a construction undertaken nearby by Military Unit 53110.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0509DEC005083119
9 mai 2023
9 mai 2023
In 2006 she was informed by the authorities that her father had made a mistake when referring to the land in Geidukonys as having belonged to D. because that land had in fact belonged to S. 4 .
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0226DEC005613115
26 février 2019
26 février 2019
It further found that there was no need to refer the case to the Constitutional Court because the latter had already decided a similar matter in its decision of 11 November 2014 (see Merkantil Car
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-112182
27 juin 2012
27 juin 2012
As to the pledge of orderly conduct, as made on the applicant’s behalf by his lawyer, it could not be accepted because it was neither written nor signed by the applicant himself and because such pledge
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0205DEC006879801
5 février 2004
5 février 2004
The appeal judgment became enforceable on the same day. On 6 December 2000 the case file was returned to the Ust-Yanskiy District Court.
Source officielleCJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2002:296
16 mai 2002
16 mai 2002
#Gemeenschappelijk landbouwbeleid - Verordening (EEG) nr. 3887/92 - Geïntegreerd beheers- en controlesysteem voor bepaalde communautaire steunregelingen - Toepassingsbepalingen - Steunaanvragen .dieren
Source officielle5ème chambre
DCA_23NT01774_20250506
6 mai 2025
6 mai 2025
suivante : Procédure contentieuse antérieure : M. et Mme G et D F, Mme C A et Mme E A ont demandé au tribunal administratif de Rennes d'annuler l'arrêté du 26 octobre 2020 par lequel le maire de Bégard
Source officielleReconduite à la frontière
DTA_2300450_20230127
27 janvier 2023
27 janvier 2023
B à l'aide juridictionnelle et de la renonciation de Me Belaid à percevoir la part contributive de l'Etat, l'Etat versera à Me Belaid la somme de 1 000 euros en application du second alinéa de l'article
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167621
19 septembre 2016
19 septembre 2016
THE CASE The application concerns the decision of the Aachen Regional Court, on 15 September 2014, to dismiss the applicant’s appeal against his conviction without an examination of the merits because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202147
4 mars 2020
4 mars 2020
The applicant complains that the proceedings were not fair because the Court of Appeal convicted him without hearing anew the witnesses.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199351
20 novembre 2019
20 novembre 2019
sent to that lawyer an extrajudicial document to which he had referred to her behaviour as “unprofessional and contrary to the ethics” (“αντιεπαγγελματική και αντιδεοντολογική”) and had criticised her because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189309
10 décembre 2018
10 décembre 2018
The applicant complains that the proceedings were not fair because the Court of Appeal convicted him without hearing anew the witnesses.
Source officiellePage 109 sur 1597