Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630DEC002320805
30 juin 2009
30 juin 2009
The fifth and sixth applicants were born from this marriage in the Netherlands, where they have been living all their life.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922DEC002852405
22 septembre 2009
22 septembre 2009
COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the civil proceedings had been excessively long and under Article 13 of the Convention that there was no effective
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0826DEC003424904
26 août 2008
26 août 2008
and that the judges had not been impartial.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630DEC000686406
30 juin 2009
30 juin 2009
Given that the applicant had stated that a warrant for his arrest had been issued containing serious accusations, he would have been detained in a facility that was under the supervision of a public prosecutor
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196313
4 septembre 2019
4 septembre 2019
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in respect of apartments 14 B and 27 C? APPENDIX No.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922DEC002108804
22 septembre 2009
22 septembre 2009
On 6 May 2009 the applicant informed the Court, in writing, that the case had been settled at the domestic level and that he wished to withdraw his application in its entirety.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1129DEC003088010
29 novembre 2011
29 novembre 2011
The representative had not received any information from his client that the latter had in fact been staying in Germany at that time.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0603DEC001524304
3 juin 2008
3 juin 2008
On several occasions he had been the victim of robberies, ill-treatment and extortion.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0119DEC001417688
19 janvier 1989
19 janvier 1989
It was stated that the letter had not been read and that when it went missing, his solicitor had been immediately contacted in order to request a second copy.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244130
13 juin 2025
13 juin 2025
own expense, even though such changes (consisting of extraordinary expenses) should have been made by the owners according to law.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214DEC003657503
14 décembre 2010
14 décembre 2010
The applicant did not claim this letter in the local post office, it was therefore returned for having been “unclaimed” (the time-limit for its storage had expired).
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2190861-2338292
27 novembre 2007
27 novembre 2007
He further claimed that the criminal proceedings against him had been unfair, and that here had been a breach of the presumption of innocence, in violation of Article 6.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1130DEC004789899
30 novembre 1999
30 novembre 1999
The Department must inform the applicant in writing whether the decision has been confirmed or reversed.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216DEC003770206
16 décembre 2014
16 décembre 2014
Under Article 6 § 3 (d) the applicant complained that he had been unable effectively to exercise his right to have witnesses examined by the courts, in particular as he had not been able
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD003464004
27 novembre 2007
27 novembre 2007
Forensic examination established that four weapons had been used in the attack, three of which had been used in previous incidents.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-185079
4 juillet 2018
4 juillet 2018
Case Date of the decision 2582/16 Marius-Andrei BUTUC 04/04/2017 26986/16 Joseph Albert Roger PATENAUDE 04/04/2017 28794/16 Constantin DUMITRU 13/06/2017 41099/14 Tracey Jayne MOLAMPHY 04/04/2017 52909
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244466
12 juin 2025
12 juin 2025
Case Date of the decision 35797/23+ Lee David CAMILLERI AND Nicholas CAMILLERI 21/11/2024 3176/21 Margaret FARRUGIA 21/11/2024 43868/21 Joseph ZAMMIT AND Anna BUSUTTIL 21/11/2024 The Committee of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC003465104
6 mars 2007
6 mars 2007
The applicant had not been informed and learned about the outcome on the radio.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68109-68577
6 juin 2000
6 juin 2000
Sofian was not recognised as the heir to his father’s estate, which included the home where he and his mother had been living.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624DEC003817808
24 juin 2014
24 juin 2014
Moreover, he had not been present during the proceedings when his detention had been ordered and the Supreme Court had ordered his detention for an indefinite period of time. 11.
Source officiellePage 11 sur 136