AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Référés
669ffbb5d9953d09165cbc0b
23 juillet 2024
23 juillet 2024
[R] [T] a acquis un camping-car Burstner T618 Harmony immatriculé BQ-273-DT.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211DEC004541312
11 décembre 2012
11 décembre 2012
The purpose of this legislation was to enable such households as indebted in foreign currency to reduce their financial burdens.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0217DEC003901304
17 février 2009
17 février 2009
As to the principle of equality of arms and the burden of proof 57.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164842
17 juin 2016
17 juin 2016
Did such deprivation or other interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy, [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-181748
21 février 2018
21 février 2018
interference: (a) necessary to secure the payment of taxes; (b) in the general interest; and (c) with regard to the payment required by the State, did it impose an excessive individual burden
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208844
22 février 2021
22 février 2021
12055/17 , 23 October 2018), did the applicant suffer an excessive individual burden?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-209629
30 mars 2021
30 mars 2021
Did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant within the meaning of that Article?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-184187
31 mai 2018
31 mai 2018
In particular, did the deprivation of property impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant on account of the amount awarded to him as expropriation compensation (see Mason and Others v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-192541
19 mars 2019
19 mars 2019
Did the deprivation of property in the present case impose an excessive and individual burden on the applicant within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177211
28 août 2017
28 août 2017
In particular, did it impose a disproportionate burden on the applicant?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-182807
10 avril 2018
10 avril 2018
The national courts dismissed the applicant’s claim on the grounds that he had not satisfied the burden of proof that the funds for the pension payments had been secured in the State’s budget.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199349
18 novembre 2019
18 novembre 2019
Was the applicant made to bear an excessive individual burden as a result of this measure?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-171932
7 février 2017
7 février 2017
Did such deprivation or other interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy, [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225247
15 mai 2023
15 mai 2023
Did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (compare Klein v. Austria , no. 57028/00, § 57, 3 March 2011)?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223227
24 janvier 2023
24 janvier 2023
Did that deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant company (see Scordino v. Italy (no. 1) [GC], no. 36813/97, ECHR 2006 ‑ V)?)?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164843
17 juin 2016
17 juin 2016
Did such deprivation or other interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy, [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187143
29 septembre 2018
29 septembre 2018
In particular, has an excessive individual burden been placed on the applicants as a result of the absence of the legal rules governing rent (see Hutten-Czapska v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188060
5 novembre 2018
5 novembre 2018
Did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-185210
5 juillet 2018
5 juillet 2018
In particular, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0630DEC006176313
30 juin 2015
30 juin 2015
Under section 112 § 1 of the Labour Act the burden of proof of the existence of a justified reason is on the employer. ...
Source officiellePage 11 sur 375