Croatia , no. 51198/08, 25 April 2013, and compare Dominka v. Slovakia , (dec.) no. 14630/12, §§ 28-36, 3   April 2018)). QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.

Croatia (dec.)

homeland war in Croatia from 7 August 1990 to 30 June 1996 are to be stayed.

In 1991 the armed conflict escalated in Croatia.

On 11 August 1994 the first applicant filed an action for damages in the Zadar Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Zadru ) against the Croatia Insurance Company ( Croatia osiguranje ), because the building

  QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charge against him, in accordance with Article   6 §   1 of the Convention?

font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 7 November 2018   FIRST SECTION Application no. 8402/17 Karlo MALIĆ against Croatia

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Did the confiscation of the applicant’s money strike a fair balance between the demands of the general interest and the requirements of the protection of the applicant’s right of

font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 7 February 2019   FIRST SECTION Application no. 45066/17 Stjepan MESIĆ against Croatia

    Did the applicant have a fair hearing within a reasonable time in the determination of her civil rights, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?   2.

QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES Did the applicant have a fair hearing, as guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

Croatia (application no. 42998/08) The applicant Đerđet Hađi, is a Croatian national who lives in Osijek (Croatia).

lodged on 30 June 2015 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr Davorin Bulić, is a national of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia who was born in 1964 and lives in Čitluk.

font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 23 January 2023   SECOND SECTION Application no. 26869/21 Viktor PUNČEC and Sylvia NELSON against Croatia

    The Government of Croatia Act 23.

On 19 May 1995 his former wife instituted civil proceedings before the Zagreb Municipal Court ( Općinski sud u Zagrebu ) seeking damages from the Republic of Croatia for the destroyed house.

Croatia and Maravić Markeš v.

fair and prompt compensation.”

Croatia , no.   22330/05, §§ 34 and 44, 5 February 2009; Bayer v.   Germany , no. 8453/04, § 39, 16 July 2009; and Vanjak v. Croatia , no.   29889/04, § 33, 14 January 2010). 27.

The applicant then applied for recognition of his status in Croatia.