The existence of the remedies must be sufficiently certain both in theory and in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness.

There appeared before the Court: - for the Government     Mr J.

  In a judgment of 17   July 2008, the Court held, unanimously that there had been no violation of Article   2 of Protocol No.

The couple did not seek to marry in the Church of England as they were practising Roman Catholics and, in any event, there is no Church of England in Northern Ireland.

At the time of the events, they all lived in Ankara.

They also requested to be remedied for the incidents.

They also submitted that there was a great risk that they would be tortured and unfairly tried in Uzbekistan.

      They complain that there is no right to privacy in the United Kingdom.

Under Article 13 of the Convention, they alleged that there were no effective remedies in domestic law in respect of their Convention grievances.

On 22 July 2004 the applicants were arrested by the police when taking photographs of the places where they had put up the posters. 1.

They were expelled from there on 26 September 2011 when the time-limit for enforcement of the orders to leave the country expired.

    On 20 July 2011 the investigators questioned Mr Ab.Ats.

  Loizides In July 1974 Andreas Loizides was serving in a battalion which was moved to the Lapithos area to support Greek Cypriot forces there.

They have requested autopsies and they have petitioned the mayor and the governor but to no avail.

They further considered that there was no infringement of Article   6 §   1 of the Convention.

There was no change. They continued for about 10 minutes until the doctor arrived.

They pointed out that there was no actual yard and detainees had access to natural light and air only during regulated hours on a balcony.

the prosecution service had the power to set aside a decision that there was no case to answer and reopen criminal proceedings without being subject to any time-limit.

On 18 July 2010 a higher ranking prosecutor upheld the decision of 7 July 2010. 13.

They acknowledged that lawyer G.S.C., who had assisted the applicant on 14 and 15   July   2003, had previously assisted the applicant’s co-accused P.A. and F.D.