Guillou en application de l’article R. 222-13 du code de justice administrative.

B A, représenté par Me Guillon, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision par laquelle le préfet de police a implicitement refusé de lui délivrer un récépissé de sa demande de titre de séjour déposée

Guillou, les conclusions de M. Beaujard, rapporteur public, et les observations de Me Bessa, représentant l’association APF France Handicap.

    By a judgment of 25 October 2010 the Tbilisi City Court found the applicant guilty of three counts of trading in influence (Article 339(1) of the Criminal Code of Georgia). 4.

  Pölten Regional Court (Kreisgericht) pronounced the divorce on 10 October 1983 stating that both parties were guilty.

The Court noted that after overturning the first-instance court’s decision to acquit, the Bucharest District Court had ruled on the merits of the accusation against the applicant and found him guilty of

pour avocat plaidant Me Pierre-Marie CHAPOUTOT du cabinet Jean-Marie GUILLOUX, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque G 818 COMM Société par actions simplifiée immatriculée au RCS de [Localité 14] sous

Gérard Guillot on 28 March 1987.

The Tverskoy Court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to a fine of RUB 1,000.

And if ever you were to convince us that you are not guilty we will say that you are not guilty; if you will not convince us we will say you are guilty."

before he has been proved guilty according to law.

Counsel for the accused applied to the judge to enter a verdict of not guilty according to section 17 of the 1967 Act.

On 21 December 2000 the trial court once more found the applicant guilty of the offence of membership of an illegal organisation and sentenced him to twelve years and six months’ imprisonment.

Removal proceedings 3 November 2017 - the Frunzenskiy District Court of Ivanovo found the applicant guilty of violating migration regulations and fined him;   11 June 2019 - the Leninskiy District

In August 2013 the District Court, sitting in a single judge formation composed of Judge F., found the applicant guilty and sentenced him to a term of imprisonment.

Independently of who was guilty and who had breached the law, the judicial organs should have intervened in order to re-establish the rule of law.

before he has been proved guilty according to law.

  The applicant was found guilty of two counts of conduct to the prejudice of good order and military discipline contrary to section 69 of the 1955 Act.