Officer Sh. went out but immediately returned with a rubber truncheon and accompanied by three officers.

    The Russian Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications. THE FACTS 3.

    The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Ms M. Karadjova and Ms M. Kotzeva, of the Ministry of Justice. 4.

Nor did he claim that the procedural formalities he was to comply with were excessive or unclear to him. 51.

    The applicants were represented by Ms L. Kušan, a lawyer practising in Ivanić Grad. The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. 3.

The remainder of the complaints were declared inadmissible.

The Hungarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr Z. Tallódi, Agent, Ministry of Public Administration and Justice. 3.

    On 11 June 1999 bankruptcy proceedings against A.M. were opened in the Zagreb Commercial Court ( Trgovački sud u Zagrebu ).

poor, as were the conditions of his detention in the court building during the court hearings.

Measurements were also taken inside the applicant’s flat on the ground floor, with all sources of noise switched on, and while chairs were being dragged across the floor inside the bar.

In November 2005 further criminal proceedings were opened concerning fraud related to the sale of flats in those buildings. The two sets of proceedings were subsequently joined. 8.

    In 2009-10 other suspected participants in the conspiracy were arrested in Tajikistan and stood trial there. Fifty-three people   were convicted. One of them, Mr.

In addition, chrome, cadmium and nickel were strong allergens.

Inmates were allowed no more than one hour of outdoor exercise per day. The cell was infested with bugs and cockroaches.

It refused to take into account the arguments by the defence about the risk of ill-treatment that the applicant would face in Uzbekistan, stating that such arguments were “based on conjectures” and were

-     Do you know what the reasons were for A.T.’s death? -     Were you personally involved in A.T.’s death?”

    The applicants were born in 1975 and 1976 respectively. 5.     On 10 July 1999 the applicants were apprehended by the police and taken to Torez Town Police Station.

When the criminal cases were opened in respect of the unlawful actions of the management of the holding, investigative actions were carried out in the course of which it was necessary to question [the

He was obliged to sit on a chair as there were no beds but it was impossible to take him to the detention unit as the investigative actions were still ongoing.