Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3743
22 septembre 2005
22 septembre 2005
Iceland , where the Court found a violation of this provision, firstly, because the number of individuals whose pensions had been reduced was not limited, as in the former case.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201706
13 février 2020
13 février 2020
judgment of 12 September 2018, delivered by the Bacău Court of Appeal, of a general tort law action brought by the applicant against a private party, namely C.B., seeking non-pecuniary damages because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188759
27 novembre 2018
27 novembre 2018
The applicant alleged further that the pre-trial chamber judge proceedings were unfair and breached his rights guaranteed by Article 6 of the Convention because they took place in chambers, without the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214427
22 novembre 2021
22 novembre 2021
The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the CCU was not “an independent and impartial tribunal established by law” because (i) the CCU failed to follow the rules
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1021DEC004526499
21 octobre 1999
21 octobre 1999
The hearing of 24 June 1993 was postponed, because of a lawyers' strike of indefinite duration, until 2 June 1994, date on which one witness was heard.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12769
11 février 2020
11 février 2020
.) - 43726/17 Decision 11.2.2020 Article 9 Article 9-1 Freedom of religion Midwife denied employment because of her religion-motivated refusal to assist in abortions: inadmissible Article 14 Discrimination
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218711
6 juillet 2022
6 juillet 2022
Croatia [Committee], no. 27228/14, 4 October 2018 where the Court found a violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention because the applicant had not been invited to the session of the
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3634
24 novembre 2005
24 novembre 2005
The employer enjoyed a margin of appreciation as regards promotion, and it had not been overstepped by considering that the applicant was unsuitable because of his political activities.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244505
9 juillet 2025
9 juillet 2025
In Mr Cojocari’s case the appeal for cassation was dismissed as inadmissible because he had failed to sign the corresponding application, whereas in Ms Haracicu’s case it was dismissed as
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242933
1 avril 2025
1 avril 2025
This request was rejected by INPS in July 2018, because lodged out of time, according to Section 14 paragraph 1 of Law no.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231319
1 février 2024
1 février 2024
He claimed 40,000 euros (EUR) for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 120,000 for pecuniary damage which he had allegedly incurred because of the erasure.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164431
30 mai 2016
30 mai 2016
On 22 June 2007 the Ministry refused the registration because the applicants had failed to amend the charter in accordance with its previous recommendations on the requirements for membership.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0724DEC000426069
24 juillet 1970
24 juillet 1970
The Court found that the applicant was not excused by the newspaper report on a decision of the Federal Constitutional Court, because, according to this decision, the permission to lodge an appeal out
Source officielle1ère chambre
6528df7faaebb88318fda612
12 octobre 2023
12 octobre 2023
MMA IARD prise en la personne de ses représentants légaux domiciliés es qualité audit siège [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] Représentée par Me Jean LECAT de la SCP BERAUD-LECAT-BOUCHET, Plaidant/Postulant
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0226DEC002827015
26 février 2019
26 février 2019
It further found that there was no need to refer the case to the Constitutional Court because the latter had already decided a similar matter in its decision of 11 November 2014 (see Merkantil Car Zrt.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178536
16 octobre 2017
16 octobre 2017
However, the proceedings had become prolonged because of the need for expert opinions and the state of health of several of the accused.
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253cc0ebd3db21cbdd8eff3
4 janvier 2012
4 janvier 2012
LANCOME PARFUMS ET BEAUTE ET COMPAGNIE prise en la personne de son gérant 29 rue du Faubourg Saint Honoré 75008 PARIS représentée par la SCP MONIN-D'AURIAC (avocats au barreau de PARIS, toque : J071
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253c909bd3db21cbdd8711f
13 mai 2004
13 mai 2004
SCHENKER BTL (et intimée RG 03/255) C/ SA AIG EUROPE anciennement dénommée UNAT SNC L'OREAL PRODUITS DE LUXE INTERNATIONAL anciennement dénommée SNC L'OREAL PARFUMS ET BEAUTE Société TRANSPORTS ERICH RASMUSSEN
Source officielle1ère chambre
DCA_24PA03695_20250703
3 juillet 2025
3 juillet 2025
Mme B A est propriétaire d'une maison individuelle située sur l'île de Beauté à Nogent-sur-Marne (Val-de-Marne), sa parcelle, cadastrée section Z numéro 102, se trouvant en bordure de Marne.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0408DEC001656490
8 avril 1991
8 avril 1991
<German> "Sollte dies so zu verstehen sein, dass selbst in Fällen des Art. 204 StGB, die allgemein und auch den Strafverfolgungs- organen bekannt sind, nicht eingeschritten wird, ausser ein
Source officiellePage 113 sur 1683