According to the latest information in the case file, an examination on the merits of this case is still pending before the Constitutional Court. 23.

  In the case of Cioffi v.

#xa0; Shelepin’s note of 3 March 1959.

  The circumstances of the case     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

  In the case of L.F. v.

    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants and according to the case file, may be summarised as follows. 3.

In the case of Matskus v.

  U added that the investigations of the tax authorities had been carried out by K and that he, U, was prepared to dispense K from his obligation to keep the matter secret.

  The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

    The case originated in an application (no.

In the case of Kolompar v.

This investigation was subsequently entrusted to the Colmar investigating judge and was closed by an order of 19 March 1996 finding that there was no case to answer, which was upheld by a judgment of 13

  In the case of Ghasabyan and Others v.

The circumstances of the case 3.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. Background to the case 4 .

In the case of Association Burestop 55 and Others v.

In the case of Mamaladze v.

en qualité de vendeuse par la société Samyl, a été admise à faire valoir ses droits à la retraite à compter du 1er juillet 1995 ; que l'employeur lui a versé une somme à titre d'indemnité de fin de carrière

In the case of Mehrabyan v.