Throughout the trial he had insisted that those witnesses should be questioned. He had also objected to the termination of the trial as long as the witnesses had not been questioned. 27.

If a trial has to be repeated following an appeal or a plea of nullity, judges who have participated in the first trial are disqualified from participating in the new trial.

P.S. testified at the trial.

    Summary trial 21.

trial court and the Court of Appeal. 32.

hearing),   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written

The prosecutor appealed against the trial judgment. The appeal court quashed the trial judgment and ordered a retrial.

It heard the applicant’s and the prosecutor’s submissions as to whether the applicant should be committed for trial.

at the stage of the pre-trial investigation.

Moreover, there is no evidence before the Court that the applicant ever requested that B. and D. be summoned by the trial court.

of the statutory 48 hour time-limit for keeping a suspect detained without a court order, the pre-trial investigation officers interrogated him, exerting pressure to confess before the pre-trial investigation

On 4   February 2014 the trial had to be stopped due to the pregnancy of the judge rapporteur. 11 .     On 25 March 2014 the court started the trial anew.

On an unspecified date the case was submitted for trial before the Tverskoy District Court of Moscow.

As the applicant had been in pre-trial detention, it had not been possible to postpone the questioning either.

On 19 February 1997 a single judge at the Istanbul State Security Court ordered the applicant’s pre-trial detention.

In accordance with the judgment, the applicant’s pre-trial detention was to be lifted when the judgment at hand entered into force.

6 § 1 (right to a fair trial)   Dölek v.

; 10,000 Moscow City Court 26/03/2021 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 23/01/2021 for compiling on offence record;   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial

On 2 October 2008 the District Court fixed the trial for 15 October 2008. On 12 April 2010 the District Court granted the prosecutor’s request to remand the applicant in custody pending trial.