Il est un ancien professeur à l'université technique de Berlin et réside à Ratzesberg (Autriche).   3.

The second applicant, born in 1940, is resident in Berlin. Both are German nationals. In the proceedings before the Commission, they are represented by Mr T. Gertner, a lawyer practising in Koblenz.

Assets in Austria   The Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, the United States of America and France have the right to dispose of all German assets in Austria in accordance with the Protocol of the Berlin

Par ailleurs, il existe des cas où elle a considéré que le grief lié à la durée de la procédure se trouvait suffisamment réparé par le seul constat de la violation de la Convention ( Berlin c.

It passed with that   Crown to the House of Habsburg in 1526, and was taken over by Prussia in 1742 under the Treaty of Berlin.

Sur ce point, les deux factures d’énergie produites, ainsi que la capture d’écran correspondant à un unique vol au mois d’octobre 2022 de Berlin à Paris, ne sont pas suffisantes à établir une résidence

Yagci, de nationalité turque, né en 1944 a son domicile à Berlin.   Il est journaliste et secrétaire général du Parti Communiste turc, considéré illégal en Turquie.

  The Convening Officer, by order dated 1 July 1994, convened a general court-martial to be held in Berlin. On 20 July 1994 the applicant was found guilty as charged.

first applicant”) and Mr   Emin   Pasha oglu Abdullayev ( Emin Paşa oğlu Abdullayev – “the second applicant”, also known as Emin Milli), who were born in 1983 and 1979 and live in Seattle and Berlin

mere reference to the amount of fines against the applicants, the Government have not explained why they consider that the applicants have suffered no significant disadvantage (compare, for instance, Berladir

Berglin , Legal Adviser,       Ministry for Foreign Affairs,   Advisers ; - for the Commission   Mr. Gaukur Jörundsson ,   Delegate . The Court heard addresses by Mr.

He made his way to Berlin and from there to Moscow where he lives to date. 8.

Christoph, a lawyer practising in Berlin. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

On 5 July 1993 Professor Geserick of the Forensic Institute of Humboldt University in Berlin submitted a second autopsy report ( Nachsektion ), at the request of Grams’s parents, in which he too concluded

Documents [concerning] Polish and Czech atrocities on the Germans   “From the land of the dead” A Jewish émigré and a native Berliner – Robert Jungk – later a famous author and a   critic of

    The applicant was represented by Mr S. von Raumer, a lawyer practising in Berlin. The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Mr H.-J. Behrens and Ms K.

Dutch Brasschaat   Vincentius REIJERS 02/09/1949 Dutch Waalre   Cornelis RIETBROEK 18/03/1945 Dutch Almere   Robin RIETVELD 08/08/1970 Dutch Goirle   Eddy RIJNTJES 25/11/1977 Dutch Berlin

  In the meantime the files had to be submitted to the Court of Appeal and to the District Court of Berlin-Schöneberg.   Furthermore disputes on the right of access had to be settled.

It codifies (see judgment of the Berlin Labour Court of 18 February 2010, file no. 38 Ca 12879/09)) the previously developed case-law of the Federal Labour Court on video surveillance at the workplace