Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0324DEC003337608
24 mars 2015
24 mars 2015
The applicant complained about delayed enforcement of the judgment in his favour taken by the justice of the peace of the Judicial District no.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1012DEC003531606
12 octobre 2010
12 octobre 2010
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the non-enforcement of a final judgment in his favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-235168
18 juin 2024
18 juin 2024
complains that the Court of Appeal failed to provide a reasoned decision and to examine an important piece of evidence favourable to him, which had informed the decision rendered by the County Court in his favour
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214405
23 novembre 2021
23 novembre 2021
After a remittal, the first-instance court ruled partly in the applicant’s favour.
Source officiellecr
6137250bcd5801467741a80e
9 février 1988
9 février 1988
des motifs équivaut à leur absence ; Attendu qu'il appert de l'arrêt attaqué et du jugement qu'il confirme qu'X..., conduisant une automobile immatriculée ..., a involontairement causé des blessures à Favet
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0215DEC003680920
15 février 2024
15 février 2024
The applicant’s complaints under Article 10 § 1 of the Convention concerning the criminal proceedings initiated for the offence of propaganda in favour of a terrorist organisation were communicated to
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1006DEC003900006
6 octobre 2015
6 octobre 2015
The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about non-enforcement of a final domestic judgments in their favour and quashing of one of them by way of
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4607
23 février 1999
23 février 1999
The applicants maintained that the enactment of the interpretative law had rendered nugatory the effects of the final judgment that had been delivered in their favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1130DEC001704605
30 novembre 2010
30 novembre 2010
1 of lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment given in his favour against a private person.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922DEC002067006
22 septembre 2009
22 septembre 2009
The applicant complained about the non-enforcement of the judgment given in her favour and about the length of the proceedings in her case.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-211007
10 juin 2021
10 juin 2021
In the same vein, the fact that the Ministry of Justice initiated the criminal proceedings against him and later used an extraordinary remedy to reverse the criminal courts’ decision in his favour was
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1106DEC004287306
6 novembre 2018
6 novembre 2018
Directorate by the applicant foundation, whereby the latter undertook to withdraw its application before the Court on the condition that the Directorate established a forty-nine-year usufruct in its favour
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0305DEC003853611
5 mars 2020
5 mars 2020
The applicant’s complaints under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention concerning the non-enforcement of the final judgment of 13 August 2007 in his favour and the lack of effective domestic
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2979
12 décembre 2006
12 décembre 2006
In a judgment given after the applicant’s release, the Investigation Division of the Paris Appeal Court ruled in favour of his extradition.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-188506
22 novembre 2018
22 novembre 2018
Her lawsuit against the eviction notice sent by the new owner of the timeshare was dismissed by the Istanbul Execution Court which held, following the quashing of its initial decision in favour of the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0215DEC005962321
15 février 2024
15 février 2024
The applicant’s complaints under Article 10 § 1 of the Convention concerning criminal proceedings initiated for an offence of propaganda in favour of a terrorist organisation were communicated to the Turkish
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1012DEC004816606
12 octobre 2010
12 octobre 2010
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the failure of the domestic courts to enforce final domestic judgment rendered in his favour, as well as of the absence of an effective
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3970
22 mars 2005
22 mars 2005
In another set of proceedings undertaken by the Government seeking a declaration that the demonstrations were illegal, the Supreme Court of Justice ruled in favour of the Government and effectively declared
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1020DEC004209405
20 octobre 2015
20 octobre 2015
l about the non ‑ enforcement of the judgments in its favour, about the bailiffs’ inaction, about unsuccessful outcome of the proceedings against bailiffs and about the refusal to award it
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0329DEC000524507
29 mars 2011
29 mars 2011
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a final domestic judgment rendered in her favour.
Source officiellePage 115 sur 606