CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

32 683 résultats pour « Trorial »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0617JUD004288118

Admin. suprême

17 juin 2025

17 juin 2025

The trial court granted that request. 21.

Source officielle

Page 115 sur 1635

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1013DEC001823291

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 1993

13 octobre 1993

  It also noted that in the course of the trial the applicant had pretended that for health reasons he could not attend the trial and thereby attempted to evade prosecution.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0826DEC005692600

Admin. suprême

26 août 2003

26 août 2003

; –     the trial of a defendant after extensive and prejudicial pre-trial publicity; –     the trial of a defendant after the loss or destruction of relevant material by the prosecution

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417JUD002680808

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2012

17 avril 2012

At those hearings the applicant made his pleadings orally before the trial court and requested to be released pending trial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0110DEC001712202

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2006

10 janvier 2006

During the pre-trial investigation, K. and J. were questioned on 16   February 1997 and on 19 January 1997, respectively.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0319DEC002346510

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2013

19 mars 2013

    Length of pre-trial detention and length of proceedings The applicant complained about the length of his pre ‑ trial detention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0325DEC004786613

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2021

25 mars 2021

    The applicant stood trial before the Ladyzhyn Court. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122JUD001038707

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2016

22 novembre 2016

He remained in custody pending investigation and trial. 6.     On 19 April and 14 July 2006 his pre-trial detention was extended.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1215JUD000576520

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2022

15 décembre 2022

    At the time the parties exchanged their observations (March 2021) the applicant was still in detention pending trial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229904

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2023

30 novembre 2023

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based     44839/22* 15/

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230938

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2024

11 janvier 2024

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0310JUD003432210

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2015

10 mars 2015

    The trial was eventually started on 9   July 2009. Subsequently, the trial court held ten further hearings by the end of 2009. 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0915JUD000609304

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2009

15 septembre 2009

within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-122325

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2013

10 juin 2013

was unable to attend trial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-184564

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2018

14 juin 2018

In the course of the pre-trial investigation no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1164

Admin. suprême

5 janvier 2010

5 janvier 2010

right to marry during the trial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-186751

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2018

11 septembre 2018

In the course of the pre-trial investigation and of the trial the courts extended the applicant’s detention on remand on twenty occasions in total.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14012

Admin. suprême

21 février 2023

21 février 2023

Albania - 52048/16 Judgment 21.2.2023 [Section III] Article 5 Article 5-3 Reasonableness of pre-trial detention Domestic courts’ failure to give relevant and sufficient reasons justifying applicant’s pre-trial

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1109DEC004642716

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2017

9 novembre 2017

Everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1   (c) of this Article shall be ... entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0908JUD007455311

Admin. suprême

8 septembre 2020

8 septembre 2020

by him during both the preliminary investigation stage and the trial. 14.

Source officielle