CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 619 résultats pour « Isabel WERTER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD004161507

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2009

8 janvier 2009

Supposing that such a risk were proven, she could not be expected to return to Israel with the child – and that would accordingly rule out the return of [the child] in view of the major psychological harm

Page 116 sur 131

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0623JUD000163803

Admin. suprême

23 juin 2008

23 juin 2008

    In late 1998 criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0717JUD003254108

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2014

17 juillet 2014

They were released in the courtroom. On 29 June 2004 the Magadan Regional Court delivered a judgment in which they were acquitted and their right to rehabilitation was acknowledged. 21.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0902JUD003562305

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2010

2 septembre 2010

s flat in Hamburg were tapped by order of the investigating judge at the Federal Court of Justice (13 October 1995 to 27 February 1996).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0515JUD001955405

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2014

15 mai 2014

They were then to talk to journalists.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0717JUD004784808

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2014

17 juillet 2014

The doctors who had treated Mr Câmpeanu were to be questioned.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1002JUD001531909

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2014

2 octobre 2014

Nektelse ”) were set out in Article 29-13. 21.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0701DEC001935904

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2008

1 juillet 2008

There were no constitutional obstacles to such a decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1002JUD006439801

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2008

2 octobre 2008

The Russian Government (“the Government”) were initially represented by Mr   P.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1112JUD000578608

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2013

12 novembre 2013

She went to her mother in tears, taking the video-camera wrapped in a towel. H stepfather took the camera from her mother.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009JUD002972311

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2012

9 octobre 2012

The Hungarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr Z. Tallódi, Co-Agent, Ministry of Public Administration and Justice. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1024JUD005294310

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2013

24 octobre 2013

    The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0721JUD003818203

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2011

21 juillet 2011

    The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs V. Lutkovska. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126DEC002368406

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2013

26 novembre 2013

    The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr   G. Matyushkin, the Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0406JUD004950710

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2017

6 avril 2017

    The applications were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”). THE FACTS 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0604JUD005215813

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2020

4 juin 2020

    The applicants were represented by various lawyers (see the appended table). 3.     The Azerbaijani Government (“the   Government”) were given notice of the applications.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1212DEC007775516

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2019

12 décembre 2019

The Court is satisfied that the domestic courts cited specific facts in support of their conclusions that the applicants were liable to obstruct justice, to re-offend or abscond.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1020JUD002202303

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2020

20 octobre 2020

    The Government were represented by their Agent, most recently, Mrs   O.F.   Ezer of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0309DEC003714207

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2010

9 mars 2010

The predecessor died in 1973 in West Berlin, in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG); the land register was not rectified.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD003378309

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2012

25 septembre 2012

The Italian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs E. Spatafora. 3.

Source officielle