23204/07, § 86, 3 March 2009, in which the applicants alleged that they had contracted tuberculosis in prison) or non-transmissible (see the case of Iamandi v. Romania , no.

In the case of Kapelko Belousova and Others v.

In the case of Antonyan v.

  The Public Prosecutor dealing with the case was informed accordingly.

Can called the police.

    On 5 May 2009 a forensic medical examination of the applicant was carried out at the request of the investigator in charge of the criminal case against the applicant.

The evidence gathered in the case did not confirm that the death of SP had been caused by criminal actions or omissions of third parties and therefore the investigation into the offence under Article 155

In the case of Voskoboynikov v.

In the case of K.T. v.

The fact that no case to take forward was established cannot be equated to the Court’s conclusion that no investigation was carried out at all. 63.

In the case of Rustamkhanli v.

In the case of Bernh Larsen Holding AS and Others v.

In the case of Tigran Ayrapetyan v.

In the case of Getoš-Magdić v.

This case was assigned to the newly composed Second Section (Rule 52 § 1). THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 9.

In the case of Raudevs v.

.) ; que la majorité des actions composant le capital de la société X... a été acquise par la société Européenne Cassiopée (société Cassiopée), constituée entre la société Apax partners et Cie ventures

In the case of Voloshyn v. Ukraine, The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mark Villiger, President,   Angelika Nußberger,   Boštjan M.

The search was carried out in the absence of a lawyer.