CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

25 790 résultats pour « Senet »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922DEC000230704

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2009

22 septembre 2009

By a letter dated 30   May   2008 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any comments he wished to make in reply, together with any claims for just

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0703DEC004182204

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2008

3 juillet 2008

By letter dated 17 December 2007 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 28 January

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0918DEC003497003

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2008

18 septembre 2008

By letter dated 28 February 2007 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant’s home address.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1007DEC000106806

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2008

7 octobre 2008

He also complained that the non-enforcement was in violation of Articles 13, 14 and 17 of the Convention THE LAW By a letter dated 12 April 2007 the Government's observations were sent to the applicant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55987

Admin. suprême

23 juillet 2001

23 juillet 2001

applicant the sum provided for in the friendly settlement; that it has transferred the amount of 17 567,60 Estonian crowns to the tax authorities, and that the decision of the European Court had been sent

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68160-68628

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2000

19 septembre 2000

The summons to attend the trial was sent only to the applicant, who received it on 7 October 1995 in a registered letter. The applicant did not appear at his trial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0212DEC002967402

Admin. suprême

12 février 2008

12 février 2008

THE LAW By letter dated 15 March 2007, the Government’s observations were sent to the applicants’ representative, who was requested to submit their observations together with any claims for just satisfaction

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0308DEC004029404

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2011

8 mars 2011

On 4 August 2010 the Government’s observations were sent to Ms   Trotsko, who was requested to submit her observations in reply, together with any claims for just satisfaction, by 15 September 2010

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0429DEC003323704

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2010

29 avril 2010

THE LAW By letter dated 15 April 2009 the Government's observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 27

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC001027507

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2010

15 juin 2010

THE LAW By letter dated 20 April 2009 the Government's observations were sent to the applicant's representative, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0524DEC002837506

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2011

24 mai 2011

After notice of the application was given to the Government, by a letter dated 29 July 2010 their observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit, by 23 September 2010, observations

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1203DEC000953905

Admin. suprême

3 décembre 2009

3 décembre 2009

THE LAW By letter dated 26 August 2008 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119DEC001859605

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2010

19 janvier 2010

THE LAW By letter dated 15 September 2009 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant’s representative, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0121DEC002140405

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2010

21 janvier 2010

THE LAW By letter dated 28 May 2009 the Government's observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 30

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0316DEC001644308

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2017

16 mars 2017

On 31 May 2016 the Court sent a letter to the applicant, noting that the period allowed for submission of his position as regards the friendly settlement in his application had expired on 18 May 2016.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1208DEC007364310

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2015

8 décembre 2015

By letter dated 16 April 2015, sent by registered mail, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his comments had expired. He was given a new time-limit until 11 May 2015.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11683

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2017

20 juin 2017

Turkey - 30905/09 Judgment 20.6.2017 [Section II] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Criminal conviction for referring to tax inspector in abusive and derogatory terms in letter sent to two

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0312DEC005081706

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2013

12 mars 2013

The above letter with the Government’s observations, sent by registered post, was served on the representative on 10 October 2012, however, no reply to either of the requests followed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1015DEC001403605

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2013

15 octobre 2013

    By a letter dated 14 February 2012, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 10 January 2012 and that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0130DEC003829208

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2020

30 janvier 2020

On 11 July 2019 the Registry sent a letter to the applicants’ representative, inviting him to submit, by 22 August 2019, the applicants’ claims for just satisfaction.

Source officielle

Page 116 sur 1290

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.