Charge and pre-trial proceedings 9.

    Provisions pertaining to pre-trial detention 26.

    The trial 15.     The trial took place in the morning of 2 February 1999 at the Bourgas Regional Court. The applicant did not have counsel and was acting pro se . 16.

However, despite those efforts, those witnesses failed to appear and their pre-trial statements were read out at the trial. 19 .

in administrative offence proceedings - right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant.

However, she did not attend the trial against the applicant.

    At a hearing held on 30 November 2006, the trial court dismissed an application lodged by 203 former employees of S. to be represented as victims ( оштетени ) at the trial.

QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES Did the applicant have a fair trial in the criminal proceedings against him, as required under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?

On the same day the trial court requested information regarding the summons of 23 November 2005.

    Charges against the applicant and trial 10.

THE LAW The applicant complained that his right to trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial had not been respected.

stage pursuant to Law no. 3842 and the subsequent use by the trial court of the statements taken in the absence of a lawyer (see Salduz v.

April 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 15934/21 Murat ARSLAN against Türkiye lodged on 19 March 2021 communicated on 17 March 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the pre-trial

The amount represented lawyer’s fees and other expenses incurred by his legal representative with the trial the applicant decided to open against the Şepreuş Mayor’s Office for the recovery of property

Poland - 45219/06 Judgment 3.2.2009 [Section IV] Article 46 Article 46-2 Execution of judgment Respondent State required to adopt further measures to eliminate structural problem of length of pre-trial

In January and October 2008 the applicant, who joined the proceedings as an auxiliary prosecutor, asked the trial court to schedule a hearing.

Six days later the applicant paid the fine but did not produce evidence of payment to the trial court.

THE LAW   Complaints under Article 5   §   3 of the Convention (excessive length of pre-trial detention and reiterated set of reasoning in the decisions on continued pre-trial detention)