On 3 March 2010 the President of the Section decided that Rule 39 should be applied in the applicant’s case for a limited period and that the applicant should not be extradited to Belarus until 25 March

    The circumstances of the case 3.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4.

In the case of Niesen v.

de Palavas ; qu'elle exerçait en dernier lieu un emploi de responsable accueil classée au niveau III, coefficient 135, de la convention collective nationale des casinos du 29 mars 2002 ; que les parties

In the case of Garumov v.

The circumstances of the cases The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

  On 3 March 1989 the applicant again applied for an extension until 31 March 1989, however this was refused by a ruling of the President on 8 March 1989.

In the case of Muravskaya v.

       The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. On 22 February 1992 the applicant married.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

A hearing was held on the case on Tuesday 12   May 2009.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. The applicant owned a plot of land in the Lutomiersk municipality.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

  In January 1968 the applicant decided not to pay his car tax until the authorities would attend to his case. On .. April 1968, he was fined on this account. On ..

  On 23 March 1994 the Wuppertal District Court convicted the applicant of drug-trafficking and gave him a one-year suspended prison sentence.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.