By a letter dated 18 January 2018, sent by registered post, the applicant’s lawyer was notified that the period allowed for submission of her observations had expired on 7 September 2017

    By letter dated 9 February 2016, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 23 June 2015

Consequently, a letter has been sent by the Court on 29   August   2014 in which both the applicant itself, and the Romanian Evangelical Church, were asked whether the applicant had a valid representative

By letter dated 30 March 2015, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 5 March 2015 and that no extension

By letter dated 28   April   2008 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any comments together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by

On 28 December 2020 the company sent the applicants letters informing them of their disciplinary dismissal as of the day after reception of the letter.

On 31 May 2016 the Court sent a letter to the applicant, noting that the period allowed for submission of his position as regards the friendly settlement in his application had expired on 18 May 2016.

By letter dated 13 September 2019, sent by registered post, the Registry notified the applicant about his failure to submit observations or to ask for extension.

By letter dated 6 March 2020, the Government’s written observations were sent to the applicant’s representative, through the Court’s Electronic Communications Service (eComms).

On 28 April 2025 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant’s representative through eComms   requesting him to inform the Court whether he maintained contact with the applicant and whether he wished

By letter of the Registry of the Court of 16 June 2003 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant’s representative.

By letter dated 3 November 2011, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of her position regarding the friendly-settlement proposal expired on 3 October

However, the relevant letter of the Court, sent through the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms), was not downloaded by the applicant company.

The letter was sent to his father’s address in accordance with the applicant’s request. No response has been received from the applicant.

On 23 July 2021 the Registry sent by registered post a letter to the applicants requesting further information concerning the communicated complaints.

After notice of the application was given to the Government, by a letter dated 11 August 2010 their observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit, by 6 October 2010, observations

By letter dated 17 September 2008 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by 19 November

These were forwarded to the applicant on 2 May 2018, sent to his address in prison where he was detained at the time of the application.

THE LAW By letter dated 20 February 2008 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by

In June 2008 it has been noticed that due to technical reasons the Court’s letters of 20 September 2007 and 10 January 2008 had been sent to a wrong address.