Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-234573
27 mai 2024
27 mai 2024
see appendix) concern criminal convictions of the applicants to prison sentences combined with a measure of suspension of the pronouncement of the judgment on charges of disseminating propaganda in favour
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231942
7 mars 2024
7 mars 2024
On 26 March 1990 the applicant company appealed to the Administrative Court of Lisbon against a decision of the municipality of Funchal revoking a construction licence that had been issued in its favour
Source officielle1ère Ch-Cab 6 Référés
68e0427474e929a9d8fd5aff
2 octobre 2025
2 octobre 2025
prise en la personne de son représentant légal dont le siège social est sis [Adresse 1] représentés par la SCP BRIFFOD/PUTHOD/CHAPPAZ, avocats au barreau de BONNEVILLE, et la SELARL CABINET LAURENT FAVET
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1129DEC005693511
29 novembre 2018
29 novembre 2018
1 to the Convention concerning the non ‑ enforcement of a judgment given in her favour against a State institution and the lack of an effective remedy were communicated to the Russian Government
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-249014
5 février 2026
5 février 2026
While the first-instance court and the court of appeal found in the applicant’s favour, the Supreme Court overturned their rulings in its decision of 19 September 2018 and dismissed the applicant’s claim
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0329DEC000595307
29 mars 2011
29 mars 2011
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a final domestic judgment rendered in his favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0123DEC003359508
23 janvier 2018
23 janvier 2018
1 to the Convention about the non-enforcement of the payment order that had been issued in its favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0610DEC001869311
10 juin 2014
10 juin 2014
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that the Ministry of Justice had failed to comply with a judgment in his favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-242118
29 janvier 2025
29 janvier 2025
regardless of whether the company had in the meantime fulfilled its primary obligation to return the equipment, he was prevented from obtaining enforcement of a final domestic courts’ decision in his favour
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1124DEC003017306
24 novembre 2009
24 novembre 2009
’s complaints under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and under Article 1 of Protocol No.1 in respect of the Government’s failure to fully enforce the final judgment in the applicant’s favour
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223411
10 février 2023
10 février 2023
However, on 6 February 2018, the Court of Appeal overturned the first-instance decision and decided in favour of the claimant.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3029
28 novembre 2006
28 novembre 2006
proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Obligation to pay expenses prior to the initiation of enforcement proceedings resulting in indigent creditor being unable to obtain enforcement in his favour
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0526DEC002894306
26 mai 2015
26 mai 2015
COMPLAINT The applicant complains under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, alleging that by failing to enforce the judgment, delivered in his favour, the State Bailiffs’ Service violated his right to peaceful
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0329DEC004819706
29 mars 2011
29 mars 2011
The applicants complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a final domestic judgment rendered in his favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0602DEC004123912
2 juin 2015
2 juin 2015
The applicant complained under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol no. 1 thereto, about the non-enforcement of judgments rendered in his favour against a socially/State-owned
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0329DEC002214407
29 mars 2011
29 mars 2011
The applicants complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a final domestic judgment rendered in his favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316DEC000061707
16 mars 2010
16 mars 2010
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment of 9 April 2004 given in her favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179385
13 novembre 2017
13 novembre 2017
Faggots should be torn to pieces. And the pieces thrown to the wind!”. In the second interview, published by the Fontanka.ru Internet news site on 6 November 2013, Mr V.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9702
20 septembre 1993
20 septembre 1993
to summon them: objection unfounded - at first instance applicant manifested desire that the court should hear the persons who had denounced or identified him and several considerations militated in favour
Source officielleMagistrat statuant seul
DTA_2201480_20230908
8 septembre 2023
8 septembre 2023
A pour avoir occupé sans droit ni titre la plage de Favone, appartenant au domaine public maritime, sur le territoire de la commune de Conca, pour une emprise de 70 m² correspondant au placement de 18
Source officiellePage 118 sur 606