Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
8ème chambre jugeant seule
ECLI:FR:CECHS:2023:472751.20231018
18 octobre 2023
18 octobre 2023
propriété des personnes publiques ; - a commis une erreur de droit en se fondant, pour juger que le terrain en litige appartenait au domaine public maritime, sur ce que les lais et relais de la plage de Favone
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253cacabd3db21cbdd8c143
22 mai 2008
22 mai 2008
RIGAULT, avoués assisté de Me Betty FAGOT-BIDOU, avocat APPELANT d'un jugement du Juge aux Affaires Familiales du Tribunal de Grande Instance de MARMANDE, décision attaquée en date du 13 Mars 2007
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-230025
15 décembre 2023
15 décembre 2023
The Supreme Special Court decided, on 13 March 2019, in favour of the jurisdiction of the administrative courts and referred the case back to the appellate court.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4659
30 octobre 2003
30 octobre 2003
Law: Article 6 – Applicability : In certain cases, the proceedings had been concluded in the applicant’s favour and had concerned serious limitations on human rights (particularly those covering the applicant
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619DEC004553709
19 juin 2018
19 juin 2018
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the failure of a State body to comply with a final judgment in the applicant’s favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177112
25 août 2017
25 août 2017
concern the convictions of the applicant for membership of the PKK, an illegal armed organisation, under Articles 220 § 6 and 314 of the Criminal Code and for disseminating propaganda in favour
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126963
12 septembre 2013
12 septembre 2013
He also chanted slogans in favour of the leader of an illegal organisation, the PKK (Kurdish Workers’ Party).
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-239174
9 décembre 2024
9 décembre 2024
. 45763/20 Galyna Stepanivna NOGA against Ukraine lodged on 28 September 2020 communicated on 9 December 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns the applicant’s deprivation of property in favour
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198530
22 octobre 2019
22 octobre 2019
According to the decision declaring the applicant a suspect, his publications incite participation in violent resistance actions and advocate in favour of the creation of a Russian autonomy in Latvia,
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225053
3 mai 2023
3 mai 2023
The municipal council’s action was allowed by the first-instance court, but the appellate court overturned the decision, finding in the applicant company’s favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316DEC001865806
16 mars 2010
16 mars 2010
The applicant complained under Articles 1, 3 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about non-enforcement of the judgment of 23 October 1997 given in her favour against a State educational
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0630DEC006723912
30 juin 2015
30 juin 2015
The applicant complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the non-enforcement of a final domestic decision rendered in his favour against
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3177
25 septembre 2006
25 septembre 2006
proceedings before the administrative court the administrative authority undertook to rescind the limited-duration exclusion order if the European Court of Human Rights gave a decision in the applicant’s favour
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102DEC005273009
2 novembre 2010
2 novembre 2010
Court decided to communicate the applicant’s complaint made in substance under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment given in its favour
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6690
14 mars 2000
14 mars 2000
November 1995 the applicant brought habeas corpus proceedings, claiming that he had not been given a formal hearing at which he was informed of the case against him and given an opportunity to argue in favour
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1018DEC004997613
18 octobre 2016
18 octobre 2016
The applicant complained that there had been a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account of the non-enforcement of final court decision given in his favour which ordered the payment of damages
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177113
24 août 2017
24 août 2017
illegal armed organization, and thus was a member of that organization on the basis of the following acts: participation in a demonstration held on 27 January 2008, covering his face, chanting slogans in favour
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0426JUD000395504
26 avril 2006
26 avril 2006
Accordingly, the Court finds that Article 6 § 1 applies to the complaint concerning non-enforcement of the final judgment in the third applicant's favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510JUD000111502
10 mai 2007
10 mai 2007
Moreover, no other judgment in the applicant's favour had become final. 32.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0312JUD001913604
12 mars 2009
12 mars 2009
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1 ON ACCOUNT OF THE QUASHING OF THE JUDGMENT IN THE APPLICANT’S FAVOUR 11.
Source officiellePage 119 sur 606
FAVOT, Benoït
Autre jugement et ordonnance — Ouvre la procédure de redressement du patrimoine professionnel et du patrimoine personnel - Date de cessation des paiements : 09 Janvier 2025 - Mandataire : PELLEGRINI Gilles, 7/9 PLace de la Gare, 94210 LA VARENNE ST HILAIRE - Entrepreneur individuel en tant qu’avocat, exerçant au 08, rue de Chantilly - 75009 PARIS, demeurant 32, rue du général Beuret - 75015 PARIS Les déclarations des créances sont à adresser au mandataire judiciaire ou sur le portail électroniqu
12/07/2026
Voir →
WURTZ, Francoise, Simone, FAVOT
07/07/2026
Voir →
FAVOT, Michelle, Léone
30/06/2026
Voir →
FAVOTTO, Angélique, Maryse, Laetitia, MOMMAYOU
09/06/2026
Voir →
FAVOTTE
28/05/2026
Voir →