CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 439 résultats pour « interruption prohibée »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

TCOM

JEUDI

6a04a234cdc6046d479aeffb

Commerce

7 mai 2026

7 mai 2026

Dans le même temps et par le même acte, les parties s'engageaient à régulariser au profit des sociétés CHANCRI INVESTISSEMENTS SARL, BURON INVESTISSMENT SAS et ESSOR SAS un Pacte de préférence, aux fins

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0503JUD000154306

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2007

3 mai 2007

Thus the applicable law did not provide for any permit for the holding of an assembly. 24.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0708JUD003602297

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2003

8 juillet 2003

The DETR also considered a paper prepared by Heathrow Airport Limited on the implications of a prohibition on night flights between 12 midnight and 5.30 a.m. 49.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0205JUD007442001

Admin. suprême

5 février 2008

5 février 2008

It found it established, firstly, that AZ had given the applicant the bribe during their meetings on 28 January and 11 February 1999, in return for a promise that the applicant would intervene favourably

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518DEC003931506

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2010

18 mai 2010

, the Court of Appeal's considerations do not exclude the possibility that De Telegraaf and the other appellants may, after the Supervisory Board has given its opinion, ... yet seek an order or a prohibition

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021JUD000954007

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2014

21 octobre 2014

  5816, entry into force 31 July 1951) provides as follows: “Section 1: Anyone who publicly insults the memory of Atatürk or swears at him shall be liable to imprisonment for a term of between one

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004JUD004443613

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2016

4 octobre 2016

    Article 31 § 3 of the Constitution, which lays down a general prohibition on disproportionate limitations on constitutional rights and freedoms (the principle of proportionality), provides

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328JUD007810314

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2017

28 mars 2017

    The Health Act (Law no. 48/90 of 24 August 1990) provides that health care is dispensed by State services and establishments and by other public or private, profit-making or non-profit entities

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD007205117

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2019

8 octobre 2019

    Section 6(4) of the Act provides that during the public event the participants are not allowed to hide their faces by way of using masks or other means for impeding their identification;

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1029JUD004409514

Admin. suprême

29 octobre 2015

29 octobre 2015

It added that a genetic test had established that the applicant’s genetic profile matched the genetic profiles of X.W.’s parents. There was therefore no doubt that the applicant’s real name was X.W.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0616JUD000173513

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2022

16 juin 2022

prosecution was inadmissible, giving the following reasons: (i) civil court judgments and administrative acts did not have the effect of res judicata for criminal courts and accordingly could not prohibit

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0512JUD003539497

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2000

12 mai 2000

    The 1997 Act provides a statutory basis for the authorisation of police surveillance operations involving interference with property or wireless telegraphy.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0124JUD001341803

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2012

24 janvier 2012

The Court will examine these grievances under Article 3 of the Convention, which provides as follows: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0306JUD005957708

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2012

6 mars 2012

    Article 113 of the Code provides that a surveillance report shall contain, inter alia , information obtained through the application of the surveillance measures.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0420JUD006615214

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2021

20 avril 2021

    They also contended that judicial supervision of a test purchase during trial did not provide sufficient guarantees.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1207JUD002607418

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2023

7 décembre 2023

The experts were not asked to comment on any possible interaction between the medication that had been administered to P.Z. and the use of the taser. 19 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529JUD003982008

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2012

29 mai 2012

    On 10 January 2006 a prosecutor authorised the covert surveillance of N. and on the following day the president of the Harju County Court authorised the interception and undercover audio

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0201JUD000920408

Admin. suprême

1 février 2022

1 février 2022

    Article 16 of the Civil Code provides for the protection of honour, dignity and professional reputation, as well as for the right to claim compensation and the publication of a denial of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1002JUD003602297

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2001

2 octobre 2001

The DETR also considered a paper prepared by Heathrow Airport Limited on the implications of a prohibition on night flights between 12 a.m. and 5.30 a.m. 39.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1207JUD000813816

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2017

7 décembre 2017

They did not provide further details in that respect. 20.

Source officielle

Page 119 sur 122

← PrécédentSuivant →