After that time-limit, on 25   June 2017, the applicant wrote a letter to the court in which she contested the claim on the basis of the said agreement that she argued had been entered into with the

It held that the rule on the gender composition of the lists of candidates in section 43(6) of the Election Act was cogent and had a constitutional basis (see paragraph 21 below).

the use rights for each lot is to be modulated so as to ensure the timely allocation of frequencies for the purposes established by the European Commission ... 3.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 3 of the Convention that he was tortured by the police between 1 and 3 May 2005 and was not provided with timely medical assistance in detention.

    The applicant alleged that final and enforceable domestic judgments rendered in his favour had not been enforced in a timely manner. 4.

    Had the applicant been represented by counsel, timely medical and toxicological examinations could have been sought to clarify these disputed issues.

However, the Supreme Court quashed the bail decision and remitted the case.

There was no basis for finding that the conviction was in any way unsafe.

It held that the ground for nullity invoked for the first time in 1994, which was in reality a new claim, had to be timely and admissible at the time when it had been introduced.

My understanding is that the basic requirements for a deprivation of liberty and for a release from detention must be symmetrical.

On 26   September 2007 (the full text of the judgment was made available on 22   October 2007) the Senate of the Supreme Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal on points of law, on the basis

carrières ; le pétitionnaire ne s'est pas engagé à faire réaliser les travaux par des entreprises spécialisées ; aucun raccordement au réseau d'assainissement n'a été prévu ; il n'est pas démontré que le bassin

In particular, they indicated that the applicant had been released from detention on 28 June 2019 after having posted bail.

Article 241.1: Grounds for reviewing judgments and decisions on the basis of new circumstances “1.

    The applicant argued that the appeal proceedings (no. 78/2019) in relation to the decision of the Administrative Court had not been timely.

[This was done] for a simple reason – in order to sell, in a timely manner, all the grain from the thousands of hectares of [J.A.’s] ‘experimental’ fields in these regions.

    Having regard to the above considerations, the Court, making its assessment on an equitable basis, finds that the amount of AZN 5,677.26 awarded to the applicant at the domestic level can

Deciding on an equitable basis, the Court awards EUR 1,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. B.     Costs and expenses 46.

The bail was paid on the same date and the applicant was released. 16.     The first hearing was scheduled for 14 June 2011.