For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

SECTION DECISION Application no. 35815/18 Marcin KORDZIŃSKI against Poland   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 10   November 2021 as a Committee composed of:   Erik

The Court observes that the applicants asserted that the length of the proceedings was incompatible with the principle of the ‘‘reasonable time’’ requirement in accordance with Article   6 § &#xa0

  m together with two other inmates. The cell was equipped with a three-tier bunk bed, a table, two cupboards and three stools.

However, in the present case, the Court is not satisfied with the justification put forward by the applicant company. 15.

Subsequently they returned with the keys for that safe, which the applicant always carried with him.

They further requested the Court to strike out the applications in accordance with Article   37 of the Convention.

They further requested the Court to strike out the applications in accordance with Article   37 of the Convention.

    Has there been an interference with the applicant’s right to respect for his home within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention?

He subsequently lodged a complaint with the Federal Constitutional Court, which on 14   December 2004 refused to examine it.

The payment was to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, together with any costs and expenses incurred, as well as any tax that may be chargeable.

In 1995 the applicant bought a flat in Baku and on 31   January 1996 she was issued with an ownership certificate.

;   The applicant company in the first case (application no. 63557/16), ANS   CM Broadcasting and Media Company (the first applicant), is a private company registered in Azerbaijan in 1999 with

    In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

    In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

Under that Rule, it is incumbent on the applicant to provide at least a minimum of information, namely his postal address, enabling the Court to conduct correspondence with him and to proceed with his

  On 19 January 1993 the applicants were charged with defamation of the Chief Superintendent.

Andrey Vasilyevich NEKRASOV against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 26   November 2013 as a Committee composed of:   Khanlar Hajiyev, President,   Erik

The applicants appealed, claiming principally that the first-instance judgment was at odds with Article 8 (right to respect for family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The applicant’s lawyer replied on 13 September 1999, but he did not provide the Registry of the Court with the relevant information.