CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-509313-510689
1 mars 2002
Croatia (application no. 48778/99)     Violation Article 6 § 1 The applicants, both Croatian nationals, are Vojin Kutić and Ana Kutić.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187550
11 octobre 2018
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Did the confiscation of the applicant’s money in the amount of EUR   12,300 strike a fair balance between the demands of the general interest and the requirements of the protection
ECLI:CEDH:001-189550
19 décembre 2018
QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of her civil rights, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?
ECLI:CEDH:001-242116
29 janvier 2025
    Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of his civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?
ECLI:CEDH:001-224009
6 mars 2023
    Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the proceedings complained of, as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular:   2.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC000972002
16 décembre 2003
On 5 December 1991 the applicants’ house in Nedeljanec, Croatia was destroyed by a mine laid down by unknown perpetrator.
ECLI:CEDH:001-155237
19 mai 2015
  By a decision of 22 May 2007 the Customs Administration temporarily stayed the proceedings in so far as they concerned the accused D.P.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0710JUD006053300
10 juillet 2003
    The applicant alleged, in particular, that he was deprived of his right of access to a court and fair trial in so far as he was prevented from having his civil claim for damages decided due
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0324DEC007566012
24 mars 2015
    Both declarations provided that the Government of Croatia: “(a) acknowledges that in the instant case there has been a violation of the applicant’s right to a fair trial within a reasonable
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0918DEC002492702
18 septembre 2003
On 11 July 1992 the applicants’ house in Sisak, Croatia, was partly destroyed by a mine laid by unknown perpetrators.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1021JUD007800801
21 octobre 2004
Both the applicant and the Republic of Croatia appealed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1212DEC004542499
12 décembre 2000
Croatia , cited above).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0129DEC001511202
29 janvier 2004
On 25 August 1992 the applicant’s house in Sukošani, Croatia was mined by unknown perpetrators.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1023DEC000976102
23 octobre 2003
On 2 February 1992 the applicant’s house in Kaštel Novi, Croatia, was mined by unknown perpetrators.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0129DEC001530802
On 12 April 1993 the applicant’s house in Lički Novi, Croatia was mined by unknown perpetrators.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0129DEC001386202
On 27 August 1994 the applicant’s house in Karlobag, Croatia was mined by unknown perpetrators.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14405
8 octobre 2024
  Croatia (dec.), 23244/16 et al, 21   September 2021, Legal Summary ; Hanževački v.   Croatia , 49439/21, 5   September 2023, Legal Summary ; Zelenika v.
ECLI:CEDH:002-6976
4 mai 2000
Croatia (dec.) - 51891/99 Decision 4.5.2000 [Section IV] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Surrender to the International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia of person suspected
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2137089-2268622
30 octobre 2007
  Since Slovenia and Croatia became independent in 1991, Croatia has taken the view that either the Ljubljana Bank or the Slovenian State should meet the liabilities owed to customers of the Croatian
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1009JUD006123700
9 octobre 2003
the Homeland War in Croatia from 17 August 1990 to 30 June 1996 were to be stayed. 21.
Page 12 sur 156