représentée par Me Leandri, demande au juge des référés sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-3 du code de justice administrative, de désigner un expert avec pour mission de se rendre sur la plage de Favone

The court found it established that the applicants had collected information, photographs and video footages of PKK members and public meetings held in favour the PKK; distributed them to media outlets

Two of the applicants brought proceedings under the Act complaining of the failure to enforce the judgments in their favour.

L. 121-1, L. 121-8 et L. 121-13 du code de l'urbanisme et avec celles du plan d'aménagement et de développement durable de Corse (PADDUC), en classant en zone agricole ou naturelle les secteurs de Favone

application concerns the alleged infringement of the principle of legal certainty resulting from the quashing of the enforcement order and de facto annulment of the final judgment in the applicant’s favour

of the Grand Chamber Article 7 Article 7-1 Nulla poena sine lege Removal from elected office pursuant to legislation introduced after the impugned offence had been committed: relinquishment in favour

On 11 March 2002, the Plenary Supreme Court issued a judgment deciding the dispute between ASITO and the pension beneficiaries in favour of the former.

This payment was effected by means of two Debit Advices of 6   December 2011 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Economy and Investment: one in favour of Dr   Austin Bencini and another in favour

  1 of the Convention about the delayed enforcement of judgments of domestic courts delivered in their favour.

On various dates the applicants brought proceedings against private parties and obtained final court decisions in their favour.

    Has the final judgment of 19   May 2005 in the applicant’s favour been fully and timeously enforced?   2.

The applicant was granted an enforcement order more than two years after the judicial decision in his favour.

    The judgments given in favour of the applicants remain largely unenforced. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 14.

    The application mainly concerns the alleged non-enforcement by the Constanţa Municipality of two judgments in favour of the applicant company and a breach of the principle of legal certainty

However, in the instant case, the first judgment in the applicant’s favour remains unenforced.

    Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the applicant complained about the non-enforcement of the judgment in her favour.

    Non-enforcement of court judgments in the applicant’s favour 6.

    On 29 May 2000 the applicant lodged a request with the Râşcani District Court seeking enforcement of the judgment in her favour.

    The decisions in the applicants' favour remain unenforced. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 8.